Tom,
I'm more than busy enough with the NetRexx Eclipse work and my other projects to take on yet another one. For the Eclipse NetRexx package, all a user has to do is to click on the "Install" button and follow the exact same process as with every other Eclipse add-on. Why is installing NetRexx under Windows (or Mac OS or Linux) more difficult than that? Why is it so complicated for a novice user? What is more important TO THE USER - having the installation be as simple and painless as possible or if there are three installers or one? Wouldn't you agree that most users want to install a package by clicking as few times as possible, not reading or entering anything and having it all work? My gripe with this seemingly endless discussion about NetRexx installation is that the most important aspect of the process (the users viewpoint) is being ignored instead of being the most important. The REXX languages have always been sold as being easy to learn, understand and use. It seems to me the installation process should be the same. Original email: ----------------- From: Tom Maynard [hidden email] Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 21:00:30 -0500 To: [hidden email], [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Error: Unable to access jarfile NetRexxF.jar On 31-May-14 12:49, [hidden email] wrote: > I truly do not understand the continued resistance to developing web based, one click installers for each of the three operating systems. I personally have no resistance, continuing or otherwise, Bill. Please just jump right in and do it. That's how I got started, and I'll be more than happy to quit when someone like you takes over. Show me what you mean. How hard could it be? -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web LIVE Free email based on Microsoft Exchange technology - http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by Kermit Kiser
Kermit, (and/or) all :
-- ;-) ;-)
;-)
************************************************* * To a NOVICE -- NetRexx user -- * ************************************************* Any and all references shall to the actual Compiler &/ Interpreter, and any variants &/ tools used (as even jar -Dxxxxxx....) should /
shall be *hidden* by simple *commands* (implemented by
.bat, .sh, may be .cmd files), I am thinking! Please keep in mind, that even for .cmd files (as nrc.cmd) the user must have already installed either OS/2 *or* ooRexx nowadays, both of that: most likely he does have *not*, thus: KISS -- Keep it Simple, Stupid ! As I'm currently going to a turkish festival (coming from the catholic church) I can *not* make any suggestions this minute ... Maybe later, this week (Moon-Day, nowadays spelled: MonDay, in english I think, ... ;-) ;-) -) ) Anyway, all: Happy Sun-Day, all :-) Thomas. ======================================================================= Am 31.05.2014 19:48, schrieb Kermit Kiser: I am not so sure that "we have done away with the problem of not finding the compiler" is completely true as yet. I will submit a change request shortly that I hope moves us in that direction. _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
In reply to this post by Gil Blais
I receive the same message, but I'm and OS X user.
Things seem to be in the right place: ==> ls /Users/CB1/Dropbox/Programming/NetRexx/NetRexx-3.05GA/lib GenerateCombinations.nrx NetRexxF.jar NetRexxC.jar ecj-4.6.3.jar ==> echo "$PATH" /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/X11/bin:/usr/local/git/bin:/usr/texbin:/Users/CB1/Dropbox/Programming/NetRexx/NetRexx-3.05GA/lib But: ==> java -jar NetRexxF.jar GenerateCombinations Error: Unable to access jarfile NetRexxF.jar I know nothing about unix/bash, so if I need to enter any commands into the terminal, please give precise instructions. Thanks a bundle. Connor. |
involves your classpath Not a OS X user but read this : java -jar NetRexxF.jar will work if you are in directory with NetRexxF.jar but GenerateCombinations will still need to find a NetRexx runtime after compile. It is alone in NetRexxR.jar for shipping App with small footprint It is also found inside NetRexxC.jar and NetRexxF.jar One of these will need to be in the classpath for compiled app to run by itself unless you add classpath options each time you run it. On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:02 PM, FreeFall <[hidden email]> wrote: I receive the same message, but I'm and OS X user. _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by FreeFall
Java does not search PATH for jar files they typically need to be listed in the CLASSPATH env. variable. As your posting indicates that your NetRexx sours is in the same location as the NetRexxF.jar try this: cd /Users/CB1/Dropbox/ java -jar ./NetRexxF.jar GenerateCombinations On 6 June 2017 at 09:02, FreeFall <[hidden email]> wrote: I receive the same message, but I'm and OS X user. Can't tweet, won't tweet!
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Alan
-- Needs more cowbell. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |