Extening class Rexx, third try:

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Extening class Rexx, third try:

ThSITC
*OR*, shall  we use:

MyStem = Stem -- own class, initialied to '' in class Stem (there
deifined as Rexx

loop i= 1 to 13
    myvar=MyStem(i) -- that does work
    --. BUT, then
    MyStem.set(i, myvar)
end--loop

But that implementation (which does exist, will make all this flavour of
NetRexx as a *human oriented* language not so human, as designed.

And will make problems with multiple indexes..

... and should we then use methods set1 (one index), set2(2 indices),
set3 (3 indices)
.... *OR what*, please ?

Mike, Rene, & all ibm-netRexx members,

Please discuss & advise.

End of interruption (in your silence)

--
Thomas Schneider (www.thsitc.com)
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)

www.thsitc.com
www.db-123.com