Fwd: Your email message was blocked

[billfen]

Who is Bernie Grandy and why was my append being sent to him?

I was under the impression that the list sent the messages?

Ian, can you explain?

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Your email message was blocked
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:43:12 -0300
From:	[hidden email]
To:	[hidden email]

The following email message was blocked by Bell Aliant Content Filtering Device:
  
   From:      [hidden email]
   To:        [hidden email]
   Subject:   Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Fwd: Your email message was blocked
   Message:   B504fbe800000.000000000001.0003.mml

Because it may contain unacceptable language, or inappropriate material.  Please remove any unacceptable or inappropriate language and resend the message.

The blocked email will be automatically deleted after 5 days.

Content Rule: Policy Management (Inbound) : Block Pornographic Language - BA

[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Tom Maynard]

On 9/11/2012 5:56 PM, Bill Fenlason wrote:
> Who is Bernie Grandy and why was my append being sent to him?

Shame on you, Bill Fenlason.  You've adopted my evil, pornographic
ways.  I'm doubly guilty.

But, to answer your questions: (A) He's obviously a subscriber to this
list -- who's missing out on some really juicy notes of late, and (B)
Your notes to the list come from you, but your reply-to address is that
of the list.  Look carefully at the header on this note: it is "from"
Tom Maynard, but your replies will go to ibm-netrexx.

I'm really not good at this pornography business.  But I do seem to be a
very bad influence on others, indeed.

Tom.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[billfen]

I'm sending my original response to Bernie (slightly modified to get
past the foolishness) - hopefully he will explain.

Tom, Thanks for the explanation.

On 9/11/2012 7:07 PM, Tom Maynard wrote:

> On 9/11/2012 5:56 PM, Bill Fenlason wrote:
>> Who is Bernie Grandy and why was my append being sent to him?
>
> Shame on you, Bill Fenlason.  You've adopted my evil, pornographic
> ways.  I'm doubly guilty.
>
> But, to answer your questions: (A) He's obviously a subscriber to this
> list -- who's missing out on some really juicy notes of late, and (B)
> Your notes to the list come from you, but your reply-to address is
> that of the list.  Look carefully at the header on this note: it is
> "from" Tom Maynard, but your replies will go to ibm-netrexx.
>
> I'm really not good at this pornography business.  But I do seem to be
> a very bad influence on others, indeed.
>
> Tom.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2437/5262 - Release Date: 09/11/12
>
>

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Tom Maynard]

On 9/11/2012 6:11 PM, Bill Fenlason wrote:
> I'm sending my original response to Bernie (slightly modified to get
> past the foolishness) - hopefully he will explain.
>

It dawned on me somewhat late that Bernie could equally easily be female
-- I actually know a couple of female Bernies (one a Bernice, the other
something completely unrelated who chooses Bernie as her nickname).  
Once again, my haste is apparent.  I need to work on that.


> Tom, Thanks for the explanation.

Well, I could also be all wet.  In fact, I am!  But I'm having that
looked into...

Tom.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[billfen]

Tom,
I feel your water pain - almost two years ago I had a 22,000 gallon
flood in my house - took over a year before the contractors got finished.

My apologies to Ms. Grandy if such is the case :)

On 9/11/2012 7:16 PM, Tom Maynard wrote:

> On 9/11/2012 6:11 PM, Bill Fenlason wrote:
>> I'm sending my original response to Bernie (slightly modified to get
>> past the foolishness) - hopefully he will explain.
>>
>
> It dawned on me somewhat late that Bernie could equally easily be
> female -- I actually know a couple of female Bernies (one a Bernice,
> the other something completely unrelated who chooses Bernie as her
> nickname).  Once again, my haste is apparent.  I need to work on that.
>
>
>> Tom, Thanks for the explanation.
>
> Well, I could also be all wet.  In fact, I am!  But I'm having that
> looked into...
>
> Tom.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/