For my current work, I do need an Implementation of Java ENUMERATIONS
as soon as possible. :-)
I do think, that I do now *know* where NetRexxC has to be modified.
I also DID enter some *proposed* implementation there at the issues &
developer's list
at KENAI.
For *Historical Reasons*, I did call this my entry *value-lists* (and
later: value range lists).
What I would need, immediately, to be able to proceed
*is a CLEAR DECISION*
wether this feature is needed and/or wanted in the NetRexx Language.
WHEN this feature is needed and/or wanted, I would collect all my
proposals for that,
and write a formal *RFE* (Request for Enhancemnt) for this issue, aslo
accompanied
by a *trial implementation*
What do you think: Do wee need ENUMERATIONS (as, for instance:
{ one,two,three,four,five,six,seven,...}
I would, however, *suggest* that we *start to count with ONE (*NOT* ZERO),
in NetRexx ...
Sincereley,
Thomas.
PS: we could then, of course, use the ZERO value *of the implementation*,
as the default definition!!
What do you think?
Shall I go ahead to implement this?
--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge
Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team
(www.netrexx.org)
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive :
http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com
www.db-123.com