Is this list active?

[billfen]

I notice that the last post to this group was more than a year ago.

I'm trying to determine if I should put any time into an Eclipse plugin editor for NetRexx.

Thanks

Bill Fenlason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ns2.hursley.ibm.com/pipermail/ibm-netrexx/attachments/20060524/a43fed97/attachment.html

Me and five people in my company develop netrexx scripts currently on
Jedit, although other developments are done in Eclipse, so we would benefit
of an integrated IDE

Regards,
Alejandro

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

adbraintage             Alejandro P?rez
[phone]                 Engineer
www.adbraintage.com           [hidden email]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Terry Fuller]

** Reply to message from "Bill Fenlason" <[hidden email]> on Wed, 24 May
2006 08:28:11 -0400

> I notice that the last post to this group was more than a year ago.

Hmmm I've got a posting from MFC from Feb '06.  
>
> I'm trying to determine if I should put any time into an Eclipse plugin editor for NetRexx.

I'd sure like one -- I'm using a text editor now...

--
Regards,
        taf

[Mike Cowlishaw-2]

> I notice that the last post to this group was more than a year ago.

I suspect the archives are no longer being updated (in fact I thought they
had been taken offline) -- ther have certainly been posts to the list this
year.

Mike

[Jerry Garren]

Bill Fenlason wrote:
> I notice that the last post to this group was more than a year ago.
>  
> I'm trying to determine if I should put any time into an Eclipse plugin
> editor for NetRexx.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> Bill Fenlason

I 'listen' carefully and hopefully  to this list.
I use NETREXX, I would be very interested in a NETREXX
plugin for Eclipse.
No matter how you spell it REXX is still the king. <g>
Jerry garren - Los Osos, CA

[Jerry McBride]

On Wednesday 24 May 2006 13:57, Jerry Garren wrote:

> Bill Fenlason wrote:
> > I notice that the last post to this group was more than a year ago.
> >
> > I'm trying to determine if I should put any time into an Eclipse plugin
> > editor for NetRexx.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Bill Fenlason
>
> I 'listen' carefully

A big DITTO... I monitor the list but rarely am able to post...



> and hopefully  to this list.
> I use NETREXX, I would be very interested in a NETREXX
> plugin for Eclipse.

Wow... to big DITTO's in one message. Yes! A NetRexx eclipse plugin would be
highly prized!

> No matter how you spell it REXX is still the king. <g>
> Jerry garren - Los Osos, CA
>

Damn... a third DITTO. I make a profound effort to put rexx onto as many
desktops and servers I can get my hands on.

Cheers all.  Jerry

[Raymundo Quirino Baquirin]

I've been coding in NetRexx using JEdit or Crimson (Windows) or Kate
(Linux).  I have played around with Eclipse and would love to use it for
NetRexx.

 On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 08:28 -0400, Bill Fenlason wrote:

> I notice that the last post to this group was more than a year ago.
>  
> I'm trying to determine if I should put any time into an Eclipse
> plugin editor for NetRexx.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> Bill Fenlason
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
>

[billfen]

Based on the responses here and to my note in comp.lang.rexx, it seems that
there is more interest in an Eclipse plugin for NetRexx than there is for
classic (ANSI) Rexx or ooRexx.  Makes sense, considering the NetRexx / Java
connection.

Thanks for the feedback.  No promises at this point, but I am working on it.

Bill Fenlason

ps  Sorry about my confusion with the state of this list.  I found it on
Yahoo Groups, and apparently they are many months behind.

Hi all!

Anyone can briefly tell me what differences are in 2.05 vs 2.02 (if any)?

At http://www-306.ibm.com/software/awdtools/netrexx/nrchange.html the
latest version is 2.02, but
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/awdtools/netrexx/download.html points to
the download of 2.05

Thanks in advance

[Mike Cowlishaw-2]

> Anyone can briefly tell me what differences are in 2.05 vs 2.02 (if
any)?

There were no functional changes.  The two minor adjustments were:

  2004.12.18 2.04  Look for moved .jars in IBM JVM
  2005.01.14 2.05  Cosmetic blank lines were written if -comments

mfc





Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Thanks!

(for the response and for the work)

Alex



                                                                           
             Mike Cowlishaw                                                
             <[hidden email]>                                              
             Sent by:                                                   To
             ibm-netrexx-bounc         IBM Netrexx                        
             [hidden email]         <[hidden email]>      
             m                                                          cc
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject
             01/03/2007 17:39          Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Changes in        
                                       version 2.05?                      
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                            
                IBM Netrexx                                                
             <ibm-netrexx@hurs                                            
               ley.ibm.com>                                                
                                                                           
                                                                           




> Anyone can briefly tell me what differences are in 2.05 vs 2.02 (if
any)?

There were no functional changes.  The two minor adjustments were:

  2004.12.18 2.04  Look for moved .jars in IBM JVM
  2005.01.14 2.05  Cosmetic blank lines were written if -comments

mfc





Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU






_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]