Java vs. NetRexx Signatures

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Java vs. NetRexx Signatures

ThSITC
I did jsut make some tests,
    and the result is:

a) Java does APPEND the type of the RESULT ('V' for VOID) to the
Parameter Types (classes) of the method SIGNATURE
b) NetRexxC does NOT.

This MIGHT be the reason why Java does require to DENOTE the Type ahead
of any declaration (which NetRexx does NOT).

I'm proposing to investigate that further, after the current NetRexxC
3.01 final is released.

Kind regards from currently still sunny Vienna,

Thomas.

--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge
Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team
(www.netrexx.org)
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)

www.thsitc.com
www.db-123.com