NetRexx I/O

[ThSITC]

Hello David, at all,
    as you mentioned all the issues about NetRexx I/O (including
performance)

*may I again ask the responsibles*

*to look at my* (ancient) implementation of RexxFile, implemented iback
n 2000, I think, after beeing very bored by Object Rexx linein/lineout
performance for a major Donauland project I did write in Object Rexx,
and which has been simply SO SLOW for 5 Meg Files, that I did invent
Rexx2Nrx those days.

After testing Max Marsiglietties implementation, as well, I decided to
re-implement any and all routines by my own.

They are already released to REXXLA under the ICU licence
are very wll tested since now more than 10 years, very quick, and
reliable, *and* do simply use 'classic Rexx'Ä linein, lineout, etc.

I do herewith ask Mr. President, to release my contribution:

org.netrexx.thsitc.runtime.compatibility

as soon as required (or possible).

Thomas.

PS: I'm currently, amongst others, working on a very< simple PRINT and
SCREEN InterFace for NetRexx, but that is still under development.

Anyway, I did already donate the above mentioned Rexx2Nrx run-time
package (documented on www.Rexx2Nrx.com, Run-Time) to REXXLA.

Expecting a spread of this mail to the parties involved, and a THANK YOU
(for me) when possible at all. Trust me, it has been a lot of work
(CHIP, Listen!)

--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge
Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team
(www.netrexx.org)

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[David Requena]

Thomas,

Isn't that already at the official svn repository?

If you mean distributing it in the compiler package I must disagree. This is one of the first components in a hopefully long list to come.

I see the compatibility lib/runtime more as a component to be automatically installed by our future installer if/when the user chooses so.

Just my 2c

------Original Message------
From: Thomas Schneider
To: David Requena
To: IBM Netrexx
Subject: NetRexx I/O
Sent: 5 Oct 2011 00:29

Hello David, at all,
    as you mentioned all the issues about NetRexx I/O (including
performance)

*may I again ask the responsibles*

*to look at my* (ancient) implementation of RexxFile, implemented iback
n 2000, I think, after beeing very bored by Object Rexx linein/lineout
performance for a major Donauland project I did write in Object Rexx,
and which has been simply SO SLOW for 5 Meg Files, that I did invent
Rexx2Nrx those days.

After testing Max Marsiglietties implementation, as well, I decided to
re-implement any and all routines by my own.

They are already released to REXXLA under the ICU licence
are very wll tested since now more than 10 years, very quick, and
reliable, *and* do simply use 'classic Rexx'Ä linein, lineout, etc.

I do herewith ask Mr. President, to release my contribution:

org.netrexx.thsitc.runtime.compatibility

as soon as required (or possible).

Thomas.

PS: I'm currently, amongst others, working on a very< simple PRINT and
SCREEN InterFace for NetRexx, but that is still under development.

Anyway, I did already donate the above mentioned Rexx2Nrx run-time
package (documented on www.Rexx2Nrx.com, Run-Time) to REXXLA.

Expecting a spread of this mail to the parties involved, and a THANK YOU
(for me) when possible at all. Trust me, it has been a lot of work
(CHIP, Listen!)

--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge
Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team
(www.netrexx.org)


-
Saludos / Kind regards,
David Requena

NOTE: The opinions expressed here represent the opinions
of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions
of those who hold other opinions.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[ThSITC]

Hi David,
     I did discuss this recently with Rene, also.

The decision was.

    Put out NetRexxC 3.01 final at the point when it's ready.
    Let us make the installer ...
    *Then* put out the CONTRIBUTIONS, step by STEP.

This approach will:

    a.) assure that everything is tested in concert with Rexx2Nrx 3.01 final
    b.) Give the community some news, in a timely manner.
    c.) Assure that all (mental?) fights are CLOSED before the release
of any contribution.

Point (c) has been NOT discussed with Rene, but is my personal opinion.
<sic>

Meanwhile, any parties interested can:

    d) become an Observer for the NetRexx project on KENAI
    e) even become a contributor, when interested.

OK?
(no reply needed, I'm with you!)

Thomas Schneider.
=======================================================================
Am 05.10.2011 00:39, schrieb David Requena:

> Thomas,
>
> Isn't that already at the official svn repository?
>
> If you mean distributing it in the compiler package I must disagree. This is one of the first components in a hopefully long list to come.
>
> I see the compatibility lib/runtime more as a component to be automatically installed by our future installer if/when the user chooses so.
>
> Just my 2c
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Thomas Schneider
> To: David Requena
> To: IBM Netrexx
> Subject: NetRexx I/O
> Sent: 5 Oct 2011 00:29
>
> Hello David, at all,
>      as you mentioned all the issues about NetRexx I/O (including
> performance)
>
> *may I again ask the responsibles*
>
> *to look at my* (ancient) implementation of RexxFile, implemented iback
> n 2000, I think, after beeing very bored by Object Rexx linein/lineout
> performance for a major Donauland project I did write in Object Rexx,
> and which has been simply SO SLOW for 5 Meg Files, that I did invent
> Rexx2Nrx those days.
>
> After testing Max Marsiglietties implementation, as well, I decided to
> re-implement any and all routines by my own.
>
> They are already released to REXXLA under the ICU licence
> are very wll tested since now more than 10 years, very quick, and
> reliable, *and* do simply use 'classic Rexx'Ä linein, lineout, etc.
>
> I do herewith ask Mr. President, to release my contribution:
>
> org.netrexx.thsitc.runtime.compatibility
>
> as soon as required (or possible).
>
> Thomas.
>
> PS: I'm currently, amongst others, working on a very<  simple PRINT and
> SCREEN InterFace for NetRexx, but that is still under development.
>
> Anyway, I did already donate the above mentioned Rexx2Nrx run-time
> package (documented on www.Rexx2Nrx.com, Run-Time) to REXXLA.
>
> Expecting a spread of this mail to the parties involved, and a THANK YOU
> (for me) when possible at all. Trust me, it has been a lot of work
> (CHIP, Listen!)
>

--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge
Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team
(www.netrexx.org)
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[ThSITC]

In point d) is a mis-spelling: it should read NetRexx 3.01 final...

Sorry.
Thomas.

Am 05.10.2011 11:34, schrieb Thomas Schneider:

> Hi David,
>     I did discuss this recently with Rene, also.
>
> The decision was.
>
>    Put out NetRexxC 3.01 final at the point when it's ready.
>    Let us make the installer ...
>    *Then* put out the CONTRIBUTIONS, step by STEP.
>
> This approach will:
>
>    a.) assure that everything is tested in concert with NetRexx 3.01
> final
>    b.) Give the community some news, in a timely manner.
>    c.) Assure that all (mental?) fights are CLOSED before the release
> of any contribution.
>
> Point (c) has been NOT discussed with Rene, but is my personal
> opinion. <sic>
>
> Meanwhile, any parties interested can:
>
>    d) become an Observer for the NetRexx project on KENAI
>    e) even become a contributor, when interested.
>
> OK?
> (no reply needed, I'm with you!)
>
> Thomas Schneider.
> =======================================================================
> Am 05.10.2011 00:39, schrieb David Requena:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Isn't that already at the official svn repository?
>>
>> If you mean distributing it in the compiler package I must disagree.
>> This is one of the first components in a hopefully long list to come.
>>
>> I see the compatibility lib/runtime more as a component to be
>> automatically installed by our future installer if/when the user
>> chooses so.
>>
>> Just my 2c
>>
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Thomas Schneider
>> To: David Requena
>> To: IBM Netrexx
>> Subject: NetRexx I/O
>> Sent: 5 Oct 2011 00:29
>>
>> Hello David, at all,
>>      as you mentioned all the issues about NetRexx I/O (including
>> performance)
>>
>> *may I again ask the responsibles*
>>
>> *to look at my* (ancient) implementation of RexxFile, implemented iback
>> n 2000, I think, after beeing very bored by Object Rexx linein/lineout
>> performance for a major Donauland project I did write in Object Rexx,
>> and which has been simply SO SLOW for 5 Meg Files, that I did invent
>> Rexx2Nrx those days.
>>
>> After testing Max Marsiglietties implementation, as well, I decided to
>> re-implement any and all routines by my own.
>>
>> They are already released to REXXLA under the ICU licence
>> are very wll tested since now more than 10 years, very quick, and
>> reliable, *and* do simply use 'classic Rexx'Ä linein, lineout, etc.
>>
>> I do herewith ask Mr. President, to release my contribution:
>>
>> org.netrexx.thsitc.runtime.compatibility
>>
>> as soon as required (or possible).
>>
>> Thomas.
>>
>> PS: I'm currently, amongst others, working on a very<  simple PRINT and
>> SCREEN InterFace for NetRexx, but that is still under development.
>>
>> Anyway, I did already donate the above mentioned Rexx2Nrx run-time
>> package (documented on www.Rexx2Nrx.com, Run-Time) to REXXLA.
>>
>> Expecting a spread of this mail to the parties involved, and a THANK YOU
>> (for me) when possible at all. Trust me, it has been a lot of work
>> (CHIP, Listen!)
>>
>
>

--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge
Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team
(www.netrexx.org)
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[rvjansen]

Correct; the compiler package will be released first, the contributed
packages (at the moment: Compatibility, njPipes and Java2Nrx) will
follow suit.

best regards,

René Jansen.


On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:39:47 +0000, David Requena wrote:

> Thomas,
>
> Isn't that already at the official svn repository?
>
> If you mean distributing it in the compiler package I must disagree.
> This is one of the first components in a hopefully long list to come.
>
> I see the compatibility lib/runtime more as a component to be
> automatically installed by our future installer if/when the user
> chooses so.
>
> Just my 2c
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Thomas Schneider
> To: David Requena
> To: IBM Netrexx
> Subject: NetRexx I/O
> Sent: 5 Oct 2011 00:29
>
> Hello David, at all,
>     as you mentioned all the issues about NetRexx I/O (including
> performance)
>
> *may I again ask the responsibles*

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[ThSITC]

It *is on the official* repository, *but when* you do not distribute it
with NetRexxC 3.01 final, I cannot distribute RexxForm and Rexx2Nrx, as
I did now change *all my soft* to the new package names ... :-(

Thomas.

PS: And, David, don't know how many computer Languages you know, but
even FORTRAN IV and FORTRAN 77 FUNCTIONS/SUBROUTINES/PROGRAMS did have a
communication, called COMMON in those Languages ;-)

=======================================================
Am 05.10.2011 00:39, schrieb David Requena:

> Thomas,
>
> Isn't that already at the official svn repository?
>
> If you mean distributing it in the compiler package I must disagree. This is one of the first components in a hopefully long list to come.
>
> I see the compatibility lib/runtime more as a component to be automatically installed by our future installer if/when the user chooses so.
>
> Just my 2c
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Thomas Schneider
> To: David Requena
> To: IBM Netrexx
> Subject: NetRexx I/O
> Sent: 5 Oct 2011 00:29
>
> Hello David, at all,
>      as you mentioned all the issues about NetRexx I/O (including
> performance)
>
> *may I again ask the responsibles*
>
> *to look at my* (ancient) implementation of RexxFile, implemented iback
> n 2000, I think, after beeing very bored by Object Rexx linein/lineout
> performance for a major Donauland project I did write in Object Rexx,
> and which has been simply SO SLOW for 5 Meg Files, that I did invent
> Rexx2Nrx those days.
>
> After testing Max Marsiglietties implementation, as well, I decided to
> re-implement any and all routines by my own.
>
> They are already released to REXXLA under the ICU licence
> are very wll tested since now more than 10 years, very quick, and
> reliable, *and* do simply use 'classic Rexx'Ä linein, lineout, etc.
>
> I do herewith ask Mr. President, to release my contribution:
>
> org.netrexx.thsitc.runtime.compatibility
>
> as soon as required (or possible).
>
> Thomas.
>
> PS: I'm currently, amongst others, working on a very<  simple PRINT and
> SCREEN InterFace for NetRexx, but that is still under development.
>
> Anyway, I did already donate the above mentioned Rexx2Nrx run-time
> package (documented on www.Rexx2Nrx.com, Run-Time) to REXXLA.
>
> Expecting a spread of this mail to the parties involved, and a THANK YOU
> (for me) when possible at all. Trust me, it has been a lot of work
> (CHIP, Listen!)
>

--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge
Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team
(www.netrexx.org)

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/