NetRexx and GCJ

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
25 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx and GCJ

Fernando Cassia-2


On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Chip Davis <[hidden email]> wrote:
JAD is an evil tool. You should never use it to decompile something to
get inspiration on how things work, and then do a
cleam

This ^^^ tends to happen when you type with you tongue so firmly planted in your cheek. ;-)

:-P You do notice that N and M are next to each other on the QWERTY keyboard. ;)
don´t you?

FC


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx and GCJ

Kermit Kiser
In reply to this post by Fernando Cassia-2
LOL! Probably not necessary however - it looks trivial to implement (Well, if you call 4-8 hrs dev work trivial...) which is why I even considered it while in the midst of my other 7 programming projects...

-- KK

On 10/7/2012 9:59 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:


On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kermit Kiser <[hidden email]> wrote:
Unfortunately, the author of the codeproject one will not provide source for some reason, so we need to write one in NetRexx anyway

JAD is an evil tool. You should never use it to decompile something to get inspiration on how things work, and then do a cleam room implementation. Please don´t.

FC


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx and GCJ

Aviatrexx
In reply to this post by David Requena
Sorry, David.

"Tongue-in-cheek is a phrase used as a figure of speech to imply that
a statement is not seriously intended and should not be taken at face
value", according to Wikipedia.  It's also used to refer to
intentional irony or sarcasm.  You used it well in your warning about JAD.

I saw your typo as the text analog to trying to pronounce "clean" with
your tongue in your cheek, and found it amusing.

Then I muddied the water by introducing a typo of my own ("your tongue").

Having explained all this, it's not nearly as funny as it seemed.
Just another example of why low-bandwidth email will never replace
voice communication... :-/

-Chip-

On 10/7/2012 18:53 David Requena said:

>
> That one I had to look up Chip. Still not sure I actually get it. Is it about clean vs smear?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Davis <[hidden email]>
> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:41:23
>
> On 10/7/2012 15:59 Fernando Cassia said:
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kermit Kiser wrote:
>>
>>      Unfortunately, the author of the codeproject one will not provide
>>      source for some reason, so we need to write one in NetRexx anyway
>>
>> JAD is an evil tool. You should never use it to decompile something to
>> get inspiration on how things work, and then do a
>> cleam
>
> This ^^^ tends to happen when you type with you tongue so firmly
> planted in your cheek. ;-)
>
>> roomimplementation. Please don´t.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx and GCJ

David Requena
Chip,

Oh, no, it wasn't me but Fernando. I know about the tongue-in-cheek idiom but I had never seen the word 'cleam' before (neither has thundebird's spellchecker as I write this). Somehow I knew I was missing some level of the joke. As it happens I did not catch "you" meta-joke!

You know, NetRexx is not the only language I try hone while participating in this community :-)

PS: Even being a non-native English speaker I notice a big difference
on how much care people puts into correctly using English between different US age groups . I'd say  there's great divide is around forty-something. I cannot quite notice such a sharp shift among British people. Am I right? Is it some false perception due to watching too many poor Hollywood movies?

OK folks, sorry for the blatant off-topic..


On 08/10/2012 8:30, Chip Davis wrote:
Sorry, David.

"Tongue-in-cheek is a phrase used as a figure of speech to imply that a statement is not seriously intended and should not be taken at face value", according to Wikipedia.  It's also used to refer to intentional irony or sarcasm.  You used it well in your warning about JAD.

I saw your typo as the text analog to trying to pronounce "clean" with your tongue in your cheek, and found it amusing.

Then I muddied the water by introducing a typo of my own ("your tongue").

Having explained all this, it's not nearly as funny as it seemed. Just another example of why low-bandwidth email will never replace voice communication... :-/

-Chip-

On 10/7/2012 18:53 David Requena said:

That one I had to look up Chip. Still not sure I actually get it. Is it about clean vs smear?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Davis [hidden email]
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:41:23

On 10/7/2012 15:59 Fernando Cassia said:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kermit Kiser wrote:

     Unfortunately, the author of the codeproject one will not provide
     source for some reason, so we need to write one in NetRexx anyway

JAD is an evil tool. You should never use it to decompile something to
get inspiration on how things work, and then do a
cleam

This ^^^ tends to happen when you type with you tongue so firmly
planted in your cheek. ;-)

roomimplementation. Please don´t.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx and GCJ

Fernando Cassia-2
In reply to this post by Aviatrexx

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Chip Davis <[hidden email]> wrote:
I saw your typo as the text analog to trying to pronounce "clean" with your tongue in your cheek, and found it amusing.


Chip,

It was me, not David, who made the humorous reference to JAD.
Please let´s get our collective reading glasses in order, as this will quickly turn into a "who ´s on first" Abbott and Costello comedy skit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k37HOam7E-g&feature=related

;-)

FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
- George Orwell


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

12