NetRexx++, etc.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

NetRexx++, etc.

Mike Cowlishaw-3
OK, very many thanks for all the comments on +=, ++ and similar
notations.  My feeling is that -- as there are people arguing on both
sides -- that the NetRexx design is about right.  Any any rate, adding
the new notations should stay on the 'maybe' list, at least for the
time being.

(My general inclination is to not add features that don't add extra
function; keeping the language small is still an objective.)

Mike Cowlishaw
IBM UK Labs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx++, etc.

John Bellatti
"Need"
very.long.variable.name + 1    ??

why not

a = 'very.long.variable.name'
translate a=a+1

Aloha   John Bellatti
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>