NetRexxC Compiler deficiency

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

NetRexxC Compiler deficiency

ThSITC
It appears, that if any statements preceeding the 'class instruction are mis-spelled, for instance

packagte com.thsitc


    *instead of*

package com.thsitc

there is NO error reported,  but the error message

class instruction has been already implied for this program

is reported at the actual class instruction.

Rene, please dof ile a bug report.

kind regards,
Thomas.

--
Thomas Schneider (www.thsitc.com)

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)

www.thsitc.com
www.db-123.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexxC Compiler deficiency

rvjansen
Thomas,

I am sure we were here before; this is because of the implied class construction when NetRexx is used in 'scripting mode'. I agree that the message could have more clarity, e.g. spell it out for those not accustomed to it, but we have to wait until IBM moves on the open sourcing before we are able to amend this.

best regards,

René

On 14 apr 2011, at 22:02, Thomas Schneider wrote:

It appears, that if any statements preceeding the 'class instruction are mis-spelled, for instance

packagte com.thsitc


    *instead of*

package com.thsitc

there is NO error reported,  but the error message

class instruction has been already implied for this program

is reported at the actual class instruction.

Rene, please dof ile a bug report.

kind regards,
Thomas.

--
Thomas Schneider (www.thsitc.com)
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexxC Compiler deficiency

ThSITC
It' NO problem for me, Rene!

I've just send the note as you did ask me some month ago to do so for building up the
deficienies list.

I've some dramatic problems, but filing them currently for my own, as nobody seems to have the authority
currently to make any deficieny fixes in NetRexx at all :-(

Happy easter to all of you,
Thomas.
 
PS: I'm currently building an SVN for my own soft on a UNIX server, and will send this group a short note,
(press release), when ready for subscription by so called *contributors*.
================================================================================
Am 15.04.2011 13:08, schrieb René Jansen:
Thomas,

I am sure we were here before; this is because of the implied class construction when NetRexx is used in 'scripting mode'. I agree that the message could have more clarity, e.g. spell it out for those not accustomed to it, but we have to wait until IBM moves on the open sourcing before we are able to amend this.

best regards,

René

On 14 apr 2011, at 22:02, Thomas Schneider wrote:

It appears, that if any statements preceeding the 'class instruction are mis-spelled, for instance

packagte com.thsitc


    *instead of*

package com.thsitc

there is NO error reported,  but the error message

class instruction has been already implied for this program

is reported at the actual class instruction.

Rene, please dof ile a bug report.

kind regards,
Thomas.

--
Thomas Schneider (www.thsitc.com)
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]


_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email]


--
Thomas Schneider (www.thsitc.com)

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)

www.thsitc.com
www.db-123.com