New Thread -- NetRexx v. JAVA

[Robert L Hamilton]

I compiled a small tidbit of NetRexx and looked at the JAVA it generated. AWESOME would be the start for a reaction. This brings up the obvious question: How is this to  be maintained?  Do you make adjustments in the JAVA or in NetRexx and recompile? 

Thanks for your time and Enjoy the Week-End.

BobH

PS: I'm trying to get the server folks to run up NetRexx;  ooREXX 4.0 is now running on it.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

[alansam]

The Java is compiler output; much like object code is the output from a C compiler or text decks are output from HLASM.  Your source code is still NetRexx and that's where you should maintain your program.

Alan.

On 29 October 2010 14:02, Robert Hamilton <[hidden email]> wrote:

I compiled a small tidbit of NetRexx and looked at the JAVA it generated. AWESOME would be the start for a reaction. This brings up the obvious question: How is this to  be maintained?  Do you make adjustments in the JAVA or in NetRexx and recompile? 

Thanks for your time and Enjoy the Week-End.

BobH

PS: I'm trying to get the server folks to run up NetRexx;  ooREXX 4.0 is now running on it.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

--
Can't tweet, won't tweet!

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

[Tom Maynard]

On 10/29/2010 4:02 PM, Robert Hamilton wrote:

I compiled a small tidbit of NetRexx and looked at the JAVA it generated. AWESOME would be the start for a reaction. This brings up the obvious question: How is this to  be maintained?  Do you make adjustments in the JAVA or in NetRexx and recompile? 

If you started with NetRexx then you should make changes in the NetRexx source.  The Java source will be updated automatically every time you recompile ... and, unless you ask for it, will not be visible at the end.

Tom.


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

[Jeff Hennick]

"The source code must be the preferred form in which a programmer would modify the program. ... Intermediate forms such as the output of a preprocessor or translator are not allowed." (The Open Source Definition from The Open Source Initiative, http://www.opensource.org/osd.html .)

Answer: NetRexx.  Don't touch the JAVA.

On 10/29/2010 5:02 PM, Robert Hamilton wrote:

I compiled a small tidbit of NetRexx and looked at the JAVA it generated. AWESOME would be the start for a reaction. This brings up the obvious question: How is this to  be maintained?  Do you make adjustments in the JAVA or in NetRexx and recompile? 

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]