Re: NetRexx Minor classes(WAS: Re:FW:[Ibm-netrexx][Enhancementproposal]:Dependentclasses andaccess to ...)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx Minor classes(WAS: Re:FW:[Ibm-netrexx][Enhancementproposal]:Dependentclasses andaccess to ...)

christel.u.w.pachl christel.u.w.pachl
Any idea why NetRexx isn't mentioned there?
IBMphobia?

Walter
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx Minor classes(WAS:Re:FW:[Ibm-netrexx][Enhancementproposal]:Dependentclasses andaccess to...)

David Requena
Walter,

If you mean the wikipaedia list, it is listed (wrongly) as a REXX implementation.

-
Saludos / Kind regards,
David Requena

-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Pachl <[hidden email]>
Sender: [hidden email]
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:53:00
To: IBM Netrexx<[hidden email]>
Reply-To: IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
Cc: Tom Maynard<[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: NetRexx Minor classes(WAS:
        Re:FW:[Ibm-netrexx][Enhancementproposal]:Dependentclasses andaccess to
        ...)

Any idea why NetRexx isn't mentioned there?
IBMphobia?

Walter
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]