Re:Source Conversion NetRexx<->Java

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re:Source Conversion NetRexx<->Java

Mike Cowlishaw-2
Martin's points are valid .. however, a reasonable Java->NetRexx converter for
the 'common code' would still be very worthwhile.   And even the more 'obscure'
cases aren't so hard if left to last.  (I recall an amazing EXEC 2 -> REXX
converted which was developed 15 years ago .. after a while it could handle
almost *anything*, including code that reassigned the meaning of keywords).
Java->NetRexx is a breeze compared to that...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mike Cowlishaw, IBM Fellow, IBM UK Laboratories
mailto:[hidden email]   [http://www2.hursley.ibm.com]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>