Re: Translatequestion [was:Welcome tothe "Ibm-netrexx"mailing list]

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Translatequestion [was:Welcome tothe "Ibm-netrexx"mailing list]

measel
Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Translatequestion [was:Welcome tothe "Ibm-netrexx"mailing list]

Yep violent agreement again. <Cowbell>

----- Original Message -----
From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
To: IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thu Apr 01 17:30:41 2010
Subject: Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Translatequestion    [was:Welcome    tothe   "Ibm-netrexx"mailing list]

I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but all of those handy features
are readily available to NetRexx.  The "killer app" example I used in my SHARE
NetRexx presentations a decade or so ago demonstrated how easy it was to create
a GUI application (not an applet) using Swing.  It was easier than ISPF... :-)

NetRexx transparently supplants Java-the-language.  All of the cool things you
can do with Java-the-platform are readily available to NetRexx classes.

That's why I tell folks that NetRexx is "Rexx with the World's Largest Built-in
Function Package".

-Chip-

On 4/1/10 17:20 Measel, Mike said:
> RMI, JDBC, Hibernate, Swing...?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [hidden email]
> <[hidden email]>
> To: IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thu Apr 01 13:04:14 2010
> Subject: Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Translate question [was:Welcome      tothe  
> "Ibm-netrexx"mailing list]
>
> One might think so, but do you have an example?  Java-the-language has many
> barnacles as a result of its 1970's C/C++ heritage.  It probably turns
> on one's
> definition of "handy" versus "sensible".  But MikeC would be the better
> authority to respond to your assertion.
>
> -Chip-
>
> On 4/1/10 16:02 Measel, Mike said:
>  > But as a standalone language it would likely _lack_ many of the handy
>  > features of java.  Can't have everything.
>  >
>  > ----- Original Message -----
>  > From: [hidden email]
>  > <[hidden email]>
>  > To: IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
>  > Sent: Thu Apr 01 11:58:01 2010
>  > Subject: Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Translate question [was: Welcome tothe     
>  > "Ibm-netrexx"mailing list]
>  >
>  > It appears that my attempt to add emphasis was not entirely
> successful. :-/
>  >
>  > The line should read:
>  >
>  >
> "_unlike_Object_Rexx,_it_could_not_be_a_fully_upwards-compatible_extension_of_the_language_."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
>
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Translatequestion [was:Welcome tothe "Ibm-netrexx"mailing list]

alansam
Hey, hands off the cow-bell; it's mine!   (Unless of course you're looking for more violence than agreement.) :-D

Alan.


On 1 April 2010 14:37, Measel, Mike <[hidden email]> wrote:

Yep violent agreement again. <Cowbell>



--
Needs more cow-bell!

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]

Alan

--
Needs more cowbell.