Hi Patric,
You are right.
I was using an older version of the NetRexx compiler.
There were a couple of bugs in the older version.
Mike had fixed those and had sent me the new version to test out
After the testing I knew he was going to put that up
but I had no idea when.
I should have checked more often.
Thanks for pointing this out.
As far as memory leakage is concerned I tested that out and you
are right. The netrexx prompt might have some problem.
I am going to test it out more and then check up with Mike on that
as soon as I have some free time.
Thanks
Satguru
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patric Bechtel" <
[hidden email]>
To: <
[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 6:53 PM
Subject: Your NetRexxJe.jar has old NetRexx Version
> Hi Satguru,
>
> first let me admit: cool stuff. Great plugin. I was already on the run
> writing such a thing, but you were faster. And your's got better than
> mine was planned. Thanks a lot!
>
> But, taking a look at your new version (which is not at plugin central
> yet, btw), I saw that the version of NetRexx you've included is in
> fact a older one than that released by MFC on late October (you heard
> right, he silently put a new version on the server :-)).
> This version is from 25.10.2000, yours is from late october.
> Especially the RxClasser, NetRexxC classes were substancially changed
> (as opposed from the size, I cannot say what changed internally).
>
> Another thing I told MFC already is that NetRexxC in prompt mode seems
> to consume all memory over time. Michael suspected that it is a bug
> of the JVM - which I do not think is the problem.
> Do you have this problem? As you seem to work with an older version,
> maybe this version does not have this bug. The newer one DOES have,
> but I did not have such an old version, to try if it has.
>
> Could you please try, too? I'll try with your version, too!
>
> tia
>
> Patric
>
>
> PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 5579 8D11 C4A4 DD84 1CC0 D2D1 112F A924
>
>
Locked
