hope you are well - I have a question.
All well
here :-).
The Rexx() constructor is defined as shared, which means package
private. Do you remember why?
I suspect it was because I couldn't see a use for the empty
constructor if you don't have access to the shared/private
values.
I am experimenting with using the Rexx class in a Kotlin program, and the
latter balked at the empty constructor. I am trying to find out if I can
influence the type inference that Kotlin does, that is why.
I changed it temporarily to not being ‘shared’ and that works, so I
wondered if that can safely be included in 3.07 - at least if you don’t mind
changing this rather fundamental concept.
Again, not sure how it would be useful, but if it works, sounds
OK. Documentation might be rather tricky!
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive :
http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Locked
