Rexx2Nrx version 7.00 public release.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Rexx2Nrx version 7.00 public release.

ThSITC
Sorry gent's,

I did have a *very hard time* to PORT all my SOFT from IBM Compiled
Rexx to IBM NetRexx.

There have been many surprises, pitfalls of my own, etc.

Now, I do think I'm really nearly thru with this effort.

What I actually did is to write an IBM RexxC compatible compiler. and
translator, to translate  all of my stuff (any and all products I did
produce)
to NetRexx. Abandoning any IBM classic REXXC support, which I did far to
late, as I did cost me a lot of energy (and Money, as well).

Now, My Question is:

Should BIG companies, (as IBM or BIG IBM Customers) , pay for the usage
of Rexx2Nrx?

What do you think?

No matter to say, that private usage of my Rexx2Nrx will be for free, as
promised, forever.... ;-)

Thomas Schneider

--

Thomas Schneider (www.thsitc.com)

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)

www.thsitc.com
www.db-123.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rexx2Nrx version 7.00 public release.

Fernando Cassia-2
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 19:27, Thomas Schneider
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Should BIG companies, (as IBM or BIG IBM Customers) , pay for the usage of
> Rexx2Nrx?
>
> What do you think?

Perhaps you could negotiate with IBM in such a way that they promote
your product, as a _service_ and then when the customer contracts IBM,
_you_ go and run the software, in-site, to do the conversion?. Just an
idea that crossed my mind.

Or perhaps you donĀ“t want to travel *THAT* much. ;)
FC

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/