When compiling a bunch of Netrexx Program Units ...

[ThSITC]

NetRexxC ...

... should give the TOTAL NUMBER OF ERRORS and WARNINGS ...

AT THE BOTTOM OF THE Compilation, Please.

It would be also helpful, to get a list of the NetRexx source files
involved, e.g. in

NetRexxC.errors.list

NetRexxC.warnings.list

what do you think ? WOULDN'T THAT HELP ?

THOMAS:




---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwICaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=5Hpk5PMi54eSJ1I4CtfX1TaeRdYNDEt73Gkc4yIRsYM&s=3e8zKuOKin47ScNTH1pvZeh2IUKLqbVc3DA7eXqycfg&e=

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[rvjansen]

Hi Thomas,

I agree that’s not an unreasonable request; but I would like to draw your attention to the return code that the compiler issues (and the option to keep it at zero with only warnings). If you add an issue on sourceforge (it might be issue 1) then I’ll think about it when I come across that part of the code).

best regards,

René

> On 1 Apr 2018, at 08:32, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> NetRexxC ...
>
> ... should give the TOTAL NUMBER OF ERRORS and WARNINGS ...
>
> AT THE BOTTOM OF THE Compilation, Please.
>
> It would be also helpful, to get a list of the NetRexx source files involved, e.g. in
>
> NetRexxC.errors.list
>
> NetRexxC.warnings.list
>
> what do you think ? WOULDN'T THAT HELP ?
>
> THOMAS:
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwICaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=5Hpk5PMi54eSJ1I4CtfX1TaeRdYNDEt73Gkc4yIRsYM&s=3e8zKuOKin47ScNTH1pvZeh2IUKLqbVc3DA7eXqycfg&e=
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Online Archive : https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ibm-2Dnetrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=PV6YNbPymqNTc1KohjQtOcMOUWvKuJFoASWhQXeOk24&s=Oxo9lYmphw0Hhb_44TdVM3_Hf2vE1Iafr60OtZzYO9I&e=
>

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Mike Cowlishaw]

 
My view, in NetRexx, C, or any other language, is that you should have no
errors or warnings on any compilation.  Then, on making a change, you might
get a handful of new errors/warnings.   If you need a count of them,
something is badly wrong.... :-)

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[rvjansen]

It’s why I don’t hire programmers that know the debugger inside out - they need it all the time …

René.

> On 1 Apr 2018, at 14:01, Mike Cowlishaw <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> My view, in NetRexx, C, or any other language, is that you should have no
> errors or warnings on any compilation.  Then, on making a change, you might
> get a handful of new errors/warnings.   If you need a count of them,
> something is badly wrong.... :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Online Archive : https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ibm-2Dnetrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=NPyctYw4FVfTe1b4dssfMM7lCQd83ycchYati8U9uh8&s=2hGcShtueESXCQVSgi-KUmVMEgCtPTj0uTwmgmRByGs&e=
>

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[ThSITC]

The NetRexx Compiler (NetrexxC) has been enhanced (changed) by Kermit, I
think, that some formerly unreported errors (like duplicate explicit
imports) do now become reported.

I DO HOWEVER AGREE ON MIKE'S VIEW that a bunch of programs should
contain neither warnings nor errors ... maybe we would then not need
*TRACE* at all  ;-) ;-) ;-)

--- END OF *FIGHT* ---

========================================================================================


Am 01.04.2018 um 20:01 schrieb Mike Cowlishaw:

>  
> My view, in NetRexx, C, or any other language, is that you should have no
> errors or warnings on any compilation.  Then, on making a change, you might
> get a handful of new errors/warnings.   If you need a count of them,
> something is badly wrong.... :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Online Archive : https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ibm-2Dnetrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com_&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=imHr0j-cod_IIF1jEC6cdEpbvALlU5YyeX21Xbjl5n8&s=aUCcVE_9eMnrskOOcdT6n-nRY-wEmGCmAvCC87iuGXw&e=
>
>

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=imHr0j-cod_IIF1jEC6cdEpbvALlU5YyeX21Xbjl5n8&s=c9EGirhSbAYwC0PxGb8l0-XLf2KPkE-rXGOj1Q4g-YM&e=

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[rvjansen]

No, that was fixed in 1998 by Mike:

/* 1998.11.17 Report error if duplicate explicit import               */

best regards,

René.

On 1 Apr 2018, at 16:30, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote:

The NetRexx Compiler (NetrexxC) has been enhanced (changed) by Kermit, I think, that some formerly unreported errors (like duplicate explicit imports) do now become reported.

I DO HOWEVER AGREE ON MIKE'S VIEW that a bunch of programs should contain neither warnings nor errors ... maybe we would then not need *TRACE* at all  ;-) ;-) ;-)

--- END OF *FIGHT* ---

========================================================================================


Am 01.04.2018 um 20:01 schrieb Mike Cowlishaw:

 My view, in NetRexx, C, or any other language, is that you should have no
errors or warnings on any compilation.  Then, on making a change, you might
get a handful of new errors/warnings.   If you need a count of them,
something is badly wrong.... :-)

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ibm-2Dnetrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com_&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=imHr0j-cod_IIF1jEC6cdEpbvALlU5YyeX21Xbjl5n8&s=aUCcVE_9eMnrskOOcdT6n-nRY-wEmGCmAvCC87iuGXw&e=

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_6rXNpPJ1fYV-3bV1za02NiR4PUelvicfHXwtnTXpXE&m=imHr0j-cod_IIF1jEC6cdEpbvALlU5YyeX21Xbjl5n8&s=c9EGirhSbAYwC0PxGb8l0-XLf2KPkE-rXGOj1Q4g-YM&e=

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/