Can somebody, more fluent in JEDIT, as I am, explain me why
'Methods' (note the PLURAL) *is flagged as a KEYWORD* in JEdit?? please... *or* is this an oversight (and thus an error) ??? ** and ** who does maintain the NetRexx Keywords for JEDIT? Thomas. -- Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
Thomas,
Probably because there is a mistake in the NetRexx mode file. Feel free to modify a local copy to work your way (see jEdit help for how). You aren't required to use the default version; I dispensed with it years ago. On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote: Can somebody, more fluent in JEDIT, as I am, explain me why _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by ThSITC
No, Robert, I'm referring to the SYNTAX hightlioghhting done by pure
JEDIT!
What I do think is, that a) 'Methods' (note the PLURAL) is NO Keyword in NetRexx b) that should be corrected in the JEDIT Keyword Control File for NetRexx But: I do *not know* who did actually do that, and also, who does maintain that (*or* I simply forgot, unfortunately :-)) Thomas. PS: Thanks for anybody more related to this for following this up :-) PPS: When you need, I can send you a sample code for this, of course. Give me a private mail, when you would need the sample ... ;-) (As attachements are not allowed here :-() ======================================================================== Am 31.01.2012 17:46, schrieb Robert Hamilton: Thomas; --
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
In reply to this post by George Hovey-2
Hello George, *and all*:
1.) I do have NO problems at all, when JEDIT does HIGHLIGHT 'Methods' as a keyword! 2.) I *would like* to get the *official NetRexx MODE File* for JEDIT corrected, but a) I don't know who did initiate this great work (except that Slava Pestov did inititiate JEDIT, years ago, on SourceForge) b) Who of this group is now *maintaining* this Jedit MODE File on SourceForge. I would like to get the *official COPY* (on SourceForge) to be altered! Kind regards from already dark Vienna, as always, Thomas. ======================================================================================= Am 31.01.2012 17:42, schrieb George Hovey: Thomas, --
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
In reply to this post by ThSITC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Hi. as the one who reworked them into what's the current distribution, I can tell that it's a keyword within "trace methods". It get's the same color as these "directive alike" keywords for that very reason. So, IMHO, it's completely ok that way. cu, Patric Thomas Schneider schrieb am 31.01.2012 17:57: > No, Robert, I'm referring to the SYNTAX hightlioghhting done by > pure JEDIT! > > What I do think is, that > > a) 'Methods' (note the PLURAL) is NO Keyword in NetRexx b) that > should be corrected in the JEDIT Keyword Control File for NetRexx > > But: > > I do *not know* who did actually do that, and also, who does > maintain that (*or* I simply forgot, unfortunately :-)) > > Thomas. > > PS: Thanks for anybody more related to this for following this up > :-) PPS: When you need, I can send you a sample code for this, of > course. > > Give me a private mail, when you would need the sample ... ;-) (As > attachements are not allowed here :-() > > ======================================================================== > > >> Thomas; >> >> Are you referring to the NetRexxDE plugin? >> >> Bob Hamilton Richardson Texas USA >> >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Thomas Schneider >> <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >> >> Can somebody, more fluent in JEDIT, as I am, explain me why >> >> 'Methods' (note the PLURAL) >> >> *is flagged as a KEYWORD* in JEdit?? >> >> please... >> >> *or* is this an oversight (and thus an error) ??? >> >> ** and ** >> >> who does maintain the NetRexx Keywords for JEDIT? >> >> Thomas. Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPT 2.5.2 iEYEARECAAYFAk8oIX0ACgkQfGgGu8y7ypChfgCfctHnnFbQTPcY4Cxol8vWLxp/ RmEAoJKf7nxnvgpnGN9Eb+xKhLKYRiwp =L2tY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by ThSITC
There is no 'official' version and nobody's maintaining it. The one that comes with the release was contributed by someone in the hazy past. It's just to get you started without incurring the daunting task of making one from scratch. Make a copy of it, make the changes you want [I suggest one at a time], and place it in your user mode directory (see help). If you are thrilled with the result, contribute it and YOU can be the maintainer.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
Hello George, and all!
I am a subscribed member of SourceForge, still, as I did open project Rexx2Nrx there, at SourceForge, before I did switch to www.kenai.com (as all my stuff is in NetRexx, and David Requena and Kermit Kiser did recommend this for my projects. Should I take over maintenance of the NetRexx Mode file for JEDIT (after the current release of my soft to KENAI)? Would be happy to support the usage of NetRexx as far as I can (and my time allows)... :-) Thomas. ================================================================================== Am 31.01.2012 18:24, schrieb George Hovey: There is no 'official' version and nobody's maintaining it. The one that comes with the release was contributed by someone in the hazy past. It's just to get you started without incurring the daunting task of making one from scratch. Make a copy of it, make the changes you want [I suggest one at a time], and place it in your user mode directory (see help). If you are thrilled with the result, contribute it and YOU can be the maintainer. --
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
jEdit includes elaborate control of syntax coloring precisely because programmers tend to feel strongly about this, and to disagree. Getting rid of METHODS as a key word will presumably make Patric (for one) unhappy.
Why not invite contributions of NetRexx mode files, along with sample output, and let users choose? They can pick the one closest to their dreams and modify it as desired.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |