Mike Cowlishaw <
[hidden email]> writes:
>Is this with NetRexx 1.140? I put a change in there that prevented
>classes in the 'root' directory of segments on the classpath being
>treated as though they were in the current directory, as that
>situation is somewhat undefined by Java and can lead to ambiguous
>classes. One other person had a problem with this, so I've backed
>out the change and refreshed the NetRexx zip files. (1.140, 30
>May 1998 .. use -verbose4 to check the date).
Netrexx reports the following version info: NetRexx 1.132 15 Apr 1998
Also, I'm using the 1.1.6 JDK for OS/2
What I found out was that I should have been using the IMPORT
command rather than relying on the path statement. After adding
IMPORT everything worked fine.
[hidden email] (\ /)
http://www.flash.net/~jpedone (\ - /)
(\ ( ) /)
(/ < > \)
(/\/\)
/ \
( )
If Windows is User-Friendly, why do you need to read` a 678 pg. manual?
BASIC is to computer programming as QWERTY is to typing. - Seymour Papert
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>
Locked
