import static
Locked
RE: /* **nonrx** <Component> ** */
 
|
Choice of IDE [Was Re: [Ibm-netrexx] /* **nonrx** <Component> ** */]
|
|
Re: Choice of IDE [Was Re: [Ibm-netrexx] /* **nonrx** <Component> ** */]
|
RE: /* **nonrx** <Component> ** */
|
|
In reply to this post by measel
Kenneth Klein
In my experiences, IDE’s are great for big projects, but a pain for the simple task. Most days I use nothing but jedit and Netrexx. Portable and compact. If I use a different machine tomorrow it takes 5 minutes to setup, not 50. My advice, spend 10 minutes learning about jars and stick with jedit. http://community.jedit.org/cgi-bin/TWiki/view/Plugins/JarMaker From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of [hidden email] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:27 AM To: IBM Netrexx Subject: Re: [Ibm-netrexx] /* **nonrx** <Component> ** */ OK, I have jedit and like what it does for me on a simple level, but like it said, it seems to have shortcomings when it comes to packages and jars. Now as far as an IDE goes NetBeans and Eclipse seem to fill the bill. But I gotta go one way or the other right? Any tips as to which path this grasshopper should follow? I'm developing on XP for distribution over the net to many platforms. [hidden email]
No, wrong: each of Eclipse, JEdit, NetBeans. Emacs: all run on Linux, Windows and MacOSX. Platform is no reason to choose one above the other. René. On 20 jan. 2012, at 00:47, Thomas Schneider wrote: Kenneth, I can not tell for Eclipse vs. JEdit vs. NetBeans. I did never find the time to actually Eclipse. >From the conversation here and also on the NetRexx Developers group, and the recent *release* of the Eclipse plugin to www.netrexx.org, I'm however thinking that this might & will be a viable Alternative. As, obviously, EMacs is for MacIntosh users :-) as we are, all, each using Editors each one of us is customiced to use (as Les Koehler XEDIT), I can only tell you that I did use originally KEDIT (an XEDIT implementation), as I did all my developments on an IBM CMS machine, some 8 years ago, than I did personally switch to UltraEdit (with a paid licence), and then to JEdit again which I did try 2002 or so, but which has been too slow for my style of quick typing at those times ... ... Nowadays, things (machines) have changed, and I personally don't have any more any performance issues open with JEdit ... But, as I say, that is a *personal choice*. Personally, it's important for me, that I can use the same Editor for any/all Languages I'm using, in particular: PL/I, COBOL, C, C++, NetRexx, Java, HTML, etc. And thus, I'm currently using Jedit (still from the DOS Comment prompt). I'm just learning (with Kermit Kiser's excellent advise & help) how to even use the SVN plugin with this tool. For various reasons, I do want: a) First complete and release my pending stuff to KENAI b) NOT to become too deeply involved in this always emerging *which Editor shall I use* discussion (due to lack of time, sorry :-()) Maybe others in this group could advise you more accurately. Kind regards, from dark Vienna, anyway.. :-) Massa Thomas ;-) ================================================================================== Am 19.01.2012 15:06, schrieb kenneth.klein@...: Danke, Thomas. Sie meinten "subscribed", btw, "I've been subscribed to.... for more.... I love JEdit, enough to sacrifice VIM, accept in cases where I am working with a package and jar files. Then I go back to the CLI. The NetRexxDE is also very cool. Is NetRexxScript like NetRexxDE or is it for writing scripts? Netbeans got boring when I was facing a steep, steep learning curve. Is Eclipse better? Any easier to understand? Maybe better for the baby-steps I am making? Kenneth Klein
Kenneth, I *personally* would advise to 1.) Immediately use JEdit (www.jedit.org) and download NetRexxDE and/or NetRexxScript from Kenai *or* 2.) Learn Eclipse, which also has a plugin *or* 3.) Learn NetBeans I have subscripted the NetBeans Development group since more that a year, but have currently no time available to integrate NetBeans with NetRexx due to my other projects. I'm sure the proper authors of 1.) and 2.) above will help you in either case. I'm currently in process to OPEN SOURCE and release my NetRexx Parser on www.netrexx.org ... Kind regards from dark Vienna, Thomas. ============================================================================== Am 18.01.2012 21:06, schrieb kenneth.klein@...: Should I give up on that sample example with the "nonrx" problems or is there a way to fix it by hand? Furthermore, should I forge onward with the java tutorial and learn all these classes and components from scratch or should I spend my time learning netbeans or eclipse? Kenneth Klein
On 17 January 2012 10:52, <kenneth.klein@...> wrote: Oh no! Does this snippet showing up in target source code when java2nrx translates a java program mean that some components are not supported, like vector? And Kermit, would you care to expound on your strategy for handling "runnable" and "run" in this source translation: ? I won't attempt to reply for Kermit but I would point out that his reply included the phrase "in the simplest case". I agree that for very simple multi-threaded implementations it's quicker to have your main class implement Runnable as it reduces the complexity: all you need do as add a run method to your class and do all your processing there. It's not necessarily the best way to develop multi-threaded applications though, particularly if your class is complicated or large and contains many properties and methods. The Swing Java examples all appear to use anonymous inner classes to provide the functionality for their Runnable implementations and probably for good reason. (NetRexx doesn't support anonymous inner classes which is why you need to create minor classes in their place.) People have made a good living instructing others on how to write robust multi-threaded applications for the JVM; it's a fun ride and I've either forgotten or not kept up to date on current best practices so I'm happy to be advised by others who have. Alan. -- Can't tweet, won't tweet!_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ -- Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org)_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ -- Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
RE: /* **nonrx** <Component> ** */
|
|
Guess I need to get updated plugins. From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
On Behalf Of [hidden email]
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
Re: /* **nonrx** <Component> ** */
|
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |