netrexx site amazon ec2 test

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
23 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx 3.00 initial testing results

Kermit Kiser
More good news!

I have updated an Android application with the new 3.00 NetRexxR.jar run time library and re-built it using Ant 1.8.2 and the 3.00 NetRexxC.jar translator. It downloaded to my Android phone and ran correctly with no problems!

-- Kermit

PS: I removed the extraneous diag directory and NetRexxC.properties file from the jar files before I tested so I am quite sure they are not needed.


On 6/11/2011 11:18 PM, Kermit Kiser wrote:
René -

Thanks for posting the 3.00 NetRexxC.jar binary. I have done some preliminary testing with NetRexxScript under jEdit using various test programs and so far the results look identical to 2.05 except for copyright and version notices of course. Congratulations! I will test with Android applications when a NetRexxR.jar is available.

One question - the 3.00 jar file is much larger than the 2.05 jar file (454KB vs 348KB), largely due to the inclusion of a "diag" directory. The individual NetRexx classes are a bit larger also. It looks like maybe your build process has added some testing code. Can that be removed?

-- Kermit


On 6/11/2011 6:06 PM, René Jansen wrote:
Jeff,

thank you for this research. Based on it, and other reports, I have redirected www.netrexx.org to the cloud - specially now the first drop of the binary 3.00 release is downloadble.
Maybe we should have a first page with <lowsrc> so it first loads a static version or some other trick. Although under a second seems quite acceptable.

best regards,

René Jansen.


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx 3.00 initial testing results

David Requena
Kermit,

NetRexxC.properties is definitely needed by NetRexxC.jar at compile/interpret time. Did you remove that?
While the translator would (probably) still work, any emitted diagnostics would consist of the string "(sorry, full message unavailable)".



2011/6/15 Kermit Kiser <[hidden email]>
More good news!

I have updated an Android application with the new 3.00 NetRexxR.jar run time library and re-built it using Ant 1.8.2 and the 3.00 NetRexxC.jar translator. It downloaded to my Android phone and ran correctly with no problems!

-- Kermit

PS: I removed the extraneous diag directory and NetRexxC.properties file from the jar files before I tested so I am quite sure they are not needed.


On 6/11/2011 11:18 PM, Kermit Kiser wrote:
René -

Thanks for posting the 3.00 NetRexxC.jar binary. I have done some preliminary testing with NetRexxScript under jEdit using various test programs and so far the results look identical to 2.05 except for copyright and version notices of course. Congratulations! I will test with Android applications when a NetRexxR.jar is available.

One question - the 3.00 jar file is much larger than the 2.05 jar file (454KB vs 348KB), largely due to the inclusion of a "diag" directory. The individual NetRexx classes are a bit larger also. It looks like maybe your build process has added some testing code. Can that be removed?

-- Kermit


On 6/11/2011 6:06 PM, René Jansen wrote:
Jeff,

thank you for this research. Based on it, and other reports, I have redirected www.netrexx.org to the cloud - specially now the first drop of the binary 3.00 release is downloadble.
Maybe we should have a first page with <lowsrc> so it first loads a static version or some other trick. Although under a second seems quite acceptable.

best regards,

René Jansen.


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/





--
Saludos / Regards,
David Requena


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NetRexx 3.00 initial testing results

Kermit Kiser
David -

Of course I did not remove the properties from NetRexxC.jar. I only took out the stuff where it was not included in the 2.05 jar files. Sorry I was not more clear about that.

-- Kermit

On 6/15/2011 12:21 AM, David Requena wrote:
Kermit,

NetRexxC.properties is definitely needed by NetRexxC.jar at compile/interpret time. Did you remove that?
While the translator would (probably) still work, any emitted diagnostics would consist of the string "(sorry, full message unavailable)".



2011/6/15 Kermit Kiser <[hidden email]>
More good news!

I have updated an Android application with the new 3.00 NetRexxR.jar run time library and re-built it using Ant 1.8.2 and the 3.00 NetRexxC.jar translator. It downloaded to my Android phone and ran correctly with no problems!

-- Kermit

PS: I removed the extraneous diag directory and NetRexxC.properties file from the jar files before I tested so I am quite sure they are not needed.


On 6/11/2011 11:18 PM, Kermit Kiser wrote:
René -

Thanks for posting the 3.00 NetRexxC.jar binary. I have done some preliminary testing with NetRexxScript under jEdit using various test programs and so far the results look identical to 2.05 except for copyright and version notices of course. Congratulations! I will test with Android applications when a NetRexxR.jar is available.

One question - the 3.00 jar file is much larger than the 2.05 jar file (454KB vs 348KB), largely due to the inclusion of a "diag" directory. The individual NetRexx classes are a bit larger also. It looks like maybe your build process has added some testing code. Can that be removed?

-- Kermit


On 6/11/2011 6:06 PM, René Jansen wrote:
Jeff,

thank you for this research. Based on it, and other reports, I have redirected www.netrexx.org to the cloud - specially now the first drop of the binary 3.00 release is downloadble.
Maybe we should have a first page with <lowsrc> so it first loads a static version or some other trick. Although under a second seems quite acceptable.

best regards,

René Jansen.



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

12