The NetRexx compiler is amazing adept at assuming what the user meant
when it encounters type declaration discrepancies, but I wonder if
this approach might be valuable as an alternative option:
http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2012/01/type-errors-as-warnings.htmlBTW, I discovered the above while verifying a link to one of the
funniest "history of computing" pieces I've ever read:
http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2009/05/brief-incomplete-and-mostly-wrong.htmlI especially like "1958" and the first 'anonymous' comment... :-)
-Chip-
_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive :
http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Locked
