Re: Since NetRexx is Java.....

Posted by Tadashi Ohmura on
URL: http://ibm-netrexx.48.s1.nabble.com/Since-NetRexx-is-Java-tp678080p678089.html

[hidden email] wrote:
>
>
> One of the Reasons I suggested using the ++ and *= is because it is
> found in native Java.  

> If NetRexx catches on with native Java programmers
> as an alternative and easier way to write Java code they
> are going to be expecting to be able to use the ++, +=, *=, etc.
 
> In addition, since using long descriptive variables is an easy way of self
> documentation, having the ++ or += does have its added benefits as
> I have said in earlier notes.

    Yes.
I agree with your 3 points.

--

     Tadashi Ohmura ( 大村 忠史 )
                      E-mail : [hidden email]
  5-3-4 kaijin  Funabashi City  Chiba Pref.  273 JAPAN
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>