Posted by
mcbrides on
URL: http://ibm-netrexx.48.s1.nabble.com/Since-NetRexx-is-Java-tp678080p678099.html
>Hello fellow NetRexxers,
>
>One of the Reasons I suggested using the ++ and *= is because it is
>found in native Java. If NetRexx catches on with native Java programmers
>as an alternative and easier way to write Java code they
>are going to be expecting to be able to use the ++, +=, *=, etc.
>I don't consider using ++ and += as a C/C++ thing, I consider it a Java thing.
>
I say, let it stop here. NetRexx is not clasicRexx, it's a language that allows
programmers to develope Java code in an easy and effient manner. That said, if
it can be done in Java, it should be able to be done in NetRexx...
N+1... Great idea...
--
/-------------------------------------\
| Jerry McBride (
[hidden email]) |
\-------------------------------------/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>