Dr. Dobb's,: A Look at the Main JVM Languages Today

[kenner]

Great. What's a good doc to get started with?

George Hovey <[hidden email]>
Sent by: [hidden email]

02/24/2012 07:53 AM

Please respond to
IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>

To	IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
cc
Subject	Re: [Ibm-netrexx] javadoc? Is it any use with .nrx source?

Absolutely!  It allows automated documentation of complex APIs with various types of cross indexing._______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[George Hovey-2]

Try this.  http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/index-137868.html

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:40 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:

Great. What's a good doc to get started with?

George Hovey <[hidden email]>
Sent by: [hidden email]

02/24/2012 07:53 AM

Please respond to
IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>

To	IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
cc
Subject	Re: [Ibm-netrexx] javadoc? Is it any use with .nrx source?

Absolutely!  It allows automated documentation of complex APIs with various types of cross indexing._______________________________________________

Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Tom Maynard]

On 2/23/2012 7:02 AM, [hidden email] wrote:

Does javadoc do anything for a netrexx programmer?

On the odd chance that you might also use languages other than NetRexx -- at work or at home -- then you should give Doxygen a look:
http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/index.html

It serves the same purpose as Javadoc, but supports several other source languages as well, is under active development (several releases per calendar year), and has a broader spectrum of output document formats (e.g. LaTeX, RTF).  It's a personal thing, of course, but I find Doxygen to be more fully-featured, easier to use, better documented, and ... well, I just prefer it. <g>

Form your own conclusion,
Tom.
P.S. Did I mention that it's free?

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/