NetBeans 6.8 IDE
Locked
 
|
Hello there,
I've just downloaded (and tried a bit) the NetBeans 6.8. IDE. Questions: 1.) Has somebody of you already used the NetBeans IDE? 2.) Are there activities underway from anybody to integrate NetRexx as a source language into NetBeans? 3.) What do you think to publish NetRexx (as a language) with my NetRexx Parser as a language supported by the NetBeans IDE? Thomas. PS: Change my signature from Tom. to Thomas. for clarity. _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email]
Tom. (ths@db-123.com)
|
|
|
1) Yes, I do constantly since 3.6 2) Don't know of any. Asked several times here for a NetRexx antlr or javacc syntax. This in necessary for an NB integration but none seems to be available. 3) Definitely great :-) BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@ -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:46:43 To: IBM Netrexx<[hidden email]> Subject: [Ibm-netrexx] NetBeans 6.8 IDE Hello there, I've just downloaded (and tried a bit) the NetBeans 6.8. IDE. Questions: 1.) Has somebody of you already used the NetBeans IDE? 2.) Are there activities underway from anybody to integrate NetRexx as a source language into NetBeans? 3.) What do you think to publish NetRexx (as a language) with my NetRexx Parser as a language supported by the NetBeans IDE? Thomas. PS: Change my signature from Tom. to Thomas. for clarity. _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] |
|
|
Hi David, Thomas,
I have a NetRexx antlr (2.x) grammar from Chad Slaughter. According to its maker it is 'almost totally' working. I have tried to interest various antlr consultants to check and complete it, but to no avail. It might be usable though. I'll send it for comparison. I suggest we test both against as much source as we can get our hands on. best regards, René. On 25 mrt 2010, at 14:59, David Requena wrote: > > 1) Yes, I do constantly since 3.6 > 2) Don't know of any. Asked several times here for a NetRexx antlr or javacc syntax. This in necessary for an NB integration but none seems to be available. > 3) Definitely great :-) > > BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:46:43 > To: IBM Netrexx<[hidden email]> > Subject: [Ibm-netrexx] NetBeans 6.8 IDE > > Hello there, > I've just downloaded (and tried a bit) the NetBeans 6.8. IDE. > > Questions: > > > 1.) Has somebody of you already used the NetBeans IDE? > 2.) Are there activities underway from anybody to integrate NetRexx as a > source language into NetBeans? > 3.) What do you think to publish NetRexx (as a language) with my NetRexx > Parser as a language > supported by the NetBeans IDE? > > Thomas. > > PS: Change my signature from Tom. to Thomas. for clarity. > > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > > > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] |
|
|
OMG! That's gonna be great!!
BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@ -----Original Message----- From: René Jansen <[hidden email]> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:16:45 To: IBM Netrexx<[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Ibm-netrexx] NetBeans 6.8 IDE Hi David, Thomas, I have a NetRexx antlr (2.x) grammar from Chad Slaughter. According to its maker it is 'almost totally' working. I have tried to interest various antlr consultants to check and complete it, but to no avail. It might be usable though. I'll send it for comparison. I suggest we test both against as much source as we can get our hands on. best regards, René. On 25 mrt 2010, at 14:59, David Requena wrote: > > 1) Yes, I do constantly since 3.6 > 2) Don't know of any. Asked several times here for a NetRexx antlr or javacc syntax. This in necessary for an NB integration but none seems to be available. > 3) Definitely great :-) > > BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:46:43 > To: IBM Netrexx<[hidden email]> > Subject: [Ibm-netrexx] NetBeans 6.8 IDE > > Hello there, > I've just downloaded (and tried a bit) the NetBeans 6.8. IDE. > > Questions: > > > 1.) Has somebody of you already used the NetBeans IDE? > 2.) Are there activities underway from anybody to integrate NetRexx as a > source language into NetBeans? > 3.) What do you think to publish NetRexx (as a language) with my NetRexx > Parser as a language > supported by the NetBeans IDE? > > Thomas. > > PS: Change my signature from Tom. to Thomas. for clarity. > > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > > > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] |
|
|
In reply to this post by rvjansen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 René Jansen schrieb am 26.03.2010 13:16: > Hi David, Thomas, > > I have a NetRexx antlr (2.x) grammar from Chad Slaughter. According to its maker it is 'almost totally' working. I have tried to interest various antlr consultants to check and complete it, but to no avail. It might be usable though. I'll send it for comparison. I suggest we test both against as much source as we can get our hands on. Hi René, please send that around... I had a antlr grammar in my hands from former nric effort, but that one was just started and far from working at all. - -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Regards Patric Bechtel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPT 2.5.2 iEYEARECAAYFAkus0eUACgkQfGgGu8y7ypAwnQCfWhDXq9Rez11wQSL1/v4XbFXs 0RoAniblQnwAuZH0IpIZRGynMT17/YMp =cdSp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] |
|
|
sorry to disappoint, but we are talking about the same grammar
René. On 26 mrt 2010, at 11:25, Patric Bechtel wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > René Jansen schrieb am 26.03.2010 13:16: >> Hi David, Thomas, >> >> I have a NetRexx antlr (2.x) grammar from Chad Slaughter. According to its maker it is 'almost totally' working. I have tried to interest various antlr consultants to check and complete it, but to no avail. It might be usable though. I'll send it for comparison. I suggest we test both against as much source as we can get our hands on. > > Hi René, > > please send that around... I had a antlr grammar in my hands from former > nric effort, but that one was just started and far from working at all. > > - -- > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Regards > Patric Bechtel > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: GnuPT 2.5.2 > > iEYEARECAAYFAkus0eUACgkQfGgGu8y7ypAwnQCfWhDXq9Rez11wQSL1/v4XbFXs > 0RoAniblQnwAuZH0IpIZRGynMT17/YMp > =cdSp > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] |
|
|
In reply to this post by Thomas.Schneider.Wien
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote:
> 3.) What do you think to publish NetRexx (as a language) with my NetRexx > Parser as a language > supported by the NetBeans IDE? I like Netbeans and prefer it to Eclipse. If my vote counts for something, then +1 FC _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] |
«
Return to ibm-netrexx
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |