Problems with 1.1.4 for OS/2

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Problems with 1.1.4 for OS/2

K.-P. Kirchdoerfer
The recently released Java 1.1.4 for OS/2 seems to have bugs in the
JITCompiler while running netrexx.
I've had different Exceptions referring to  'bad options' while
compiling netrexx files.
Mike said this error messages are 'spurious' and that the Java people
at Hursley might look into JITCompiler.
(Thanks for the fast respone.)

Cause Ed Tomlinson reported similary errors at the Hursley newsgroups
I'd say 'beware of 1.1.4 for OS/2 if you need netrexx' and who
doesn't need it?

I've deinstalled 1.1.4 and reinstalled 1.1.1; the _newest_ Feature
Installer 1.21 is pretty helpful, especially if you run Warp Connect.

regards kp
--
K.P.Kirchdoerfer                      Voice:   +49 431 15479
24116 Kiel                            E-Mail: [hidden email]

The Mission Is Terminated (TG 1982)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problems with 1.1.4 for OS/2

Dennis Peterson
On that subject, anyone getting the following error when attempting to install 1.1.4:
**NULLID** :: Exception -1073741819 returned to instthrd.c 532l

I have given up after several days of trying to install it. 1.1.1 installs fine so I guess I will
continue to use it. It would be really nice if the installer didn't require Netscape - it would
simplify things a bit. Give me a zip file any time :-)

dp


On Sat, 22 Nov 97 21:45:41 +0100, K.-P. Kirchd”rfer wrote:

>The recently released Java 1.1.4 for OS/2 seems to have bugs in the
>JITCompiler while running netrexx.
>I've had different Exceptions referring to  'bad options' while
>compiling netrexx files.
>Mike said this error messages are 'spurious' and that the Java people
>at Hursley might look into JITCompiler.
>(Thanks for the fast respone.)
>
>Cause Ed Tomlinson reported similary errors at the Hursley newsgroups
>I'd say 'beware of 1.1.4 for OS/2 if you need netrexx' and who
>doesn't need it?
>
>I've deinstalled 1.1.4 and reinstalled 1.1.1; the _newest_ Feature
>Installer 1.21 is pretty helpful, especially if you run Warp Connect.
>
>regards kp
>--
>K.P.Kirchdoerfer                      Voice:   +49 431 15479
>24116 Kiel                            E-Mail: [hidden email]
>
>The Mission Is Terminated (TG 1982)
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
>[hidden email]
>with the following message in the body of the note
>unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problems with 1.1.4 for OS/2

Ed Tomlinson
In reply to this post by K.-P. Kirchdoerfer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sun, 23 Nov 97 15:44:19, Dennis Peterson wrote:

>On that subject, anyone getting the following error when attempting to install 1.1.4:
>**NULLID** :: Exception -1073741819 returned to instthrd.c 532l

I have seen this too.  It happens at 97% percent complete and does not seem to affect
the install - just its a pain in the rear end.

I ****REALY**** wish IBM would start using a common install format (like Debian's .deb
or Redhat's .rpm or IBM's MSHP, or SES).  It would really help if OS2 started using
ONE installer for All components, drivers and applications.  Its also VERY important
to document how its working so that when it fails it can be fixed manually.  For instance
I cannot get peerinst.exe to work here (SYS3175s even with FP5) and there is not much
I can do except try a complete reinstall or OS2... and that really stinks.

Thanks for listening to my raving <grin>

Luck,
Ed Tomlinson ([hidden email])
Montreal, Canada

To obtain my public key mail me with a subject of: PGP Key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBNHjnijaYyP7siYcJAQGutwgAlSVyqQ7e3HMvkYd3SVzALEWux1AhDF77
N6pSrNHbvHm7p25u8O06djpuq2uCRA28Z7GxLB/i4s2k2cvINxrPCg4dAmkc16qr
ZIIUNyZABiiZ7XRInQI7XyFKZHDEPS5SgI2jO2VQFlK8qfQNTR0l4uy+tU3cRF4T
K4U9CMxAZpa71bqCpNG0wzMKMOUP6MiAsJ5q03ihy2l+IIAIalk39l+0pv5C3Bkw
XAEREsA+bE3IUtx+t61s79asRZK9sri9kO3G7D/oDE22yoe2Ep8cYR2zj2EGQNml
1/VyjDfR07wnvDjX/ujaSAkbgl5yrf6RRqJHuEmmanrzc1dBR0dejw==
=W2+j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Problems with 1.1.4 for OS/2

Tadashi Ohmura
Ed Tomlinson wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Sun, 23 Nov 97 15:44:19, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> >On that subject, anyone getting the following error when attempting to install 1.1.4:
> >**NULLID** :: Exception -1073741819 returned to instthrd.c 532l
>
> I have seen this too.  It happens at 97% percent complete and does not seem to affect
> the install - just its a pain in the rear end.
>
   Will you turn off JIT ?
I solved the problem by this way.
SET JAVA_COMPILER=XYZ

   Without JIT, netrexx compiler runs well.

--

     Tadashi Ohmura ( ‘呺 ’‰Žj )
                      E-mail : [hidden email]
  5-3-4 kaijin  Funabashi City  Chiba Pref.  273 JAPAN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to
[hidden email]
with the following message in the body of the note
unsubscribe ibm-netrexx <e-mail address>