Re: [nbdev] Java Compilers
Locked
 
|
Hello Richard,
may I ask you that you also have a look at the NetRexx Languages, which has now been OPEN SOURCED by IBM. From my experience, after yeras, it is much more easier to develop Programs for the Java JVM in NetRexx, than in pure Java. But that is my personal Opinion, and experience, of course. You'll find details about the current state of NetRexx at www.netrexx.org, by the way. Maintenance is now done by the REXX Language association (www.RexxLa.org). The user's group ibm-netrexx, which I copy here for info, is used by NetRexx user's worldwide for Questions and Answer's. Kind regards from Vienna, Thomas Schneider. ================================================ 22.09.2011 18:05, schrieb [hidden email] Gentlemen: --
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
|
Crosspost Violation! 15 yard penalty and loss of down...
On 22 September 2011 10:00, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote:
Can't tweet, won't tweet! _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Alan
-- Needs more cowbell. |
|
I’m American and that doesn’t even mean anything to me (not a sports fan). What chance does an Austrian have? D From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alan Sampson Crosspost Violation! 15 yard penalty and loss of down... On 22 September 2011 10:00, Thomas Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello Richard, Gentlemen: --
-- _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
|
|
In reply to this post by alansam
Say What????
BobH On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Alan Sampson <[hidden email]> wrote: Crosspost Violation! 15 yard penalty and loss of down... _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
|
|
In reply to this post by dsgoen
On 22 September 2011 10:51, David Scott Goen <[hidden email]> wrote:
But you got that it was a sports reference so it must have meant something to you :-D OK How about this then:
Reckless cross-posting! Cautioned and shown the Yellow Card.
Can't tweet, won't tweet! _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Alan
-- Needs more cowbell. |
|
|
In reply to this post by ThSITC
Thomas,
Did it cross your mind that your note contained zero information content to members of ibm-netrexx? If you wanted us to see that you were being an advocate for NetRexx among the NetBeans crowd, well, so what? Rest assured that we all are advocates of NetRexx in other communities. We don't need or want to see that you are spreading the word. You don't see us cross-posting when we do it, do you? Furthermore, you referred to ibm-netrexx as a "user's group", not a listserver, and gave him no information for joining us. If your intention was that he would pick up on the fact that you "cc:" that address, you not only cross-posted us for no good reason but made it very unlikely that he figured out the association in the first place. Why didn't you give him "[hidden email]" in your message and spare us yet-another-obnoxious-Thomas-Schneider-crosspost? -Chip- On 9/22/11 17:00 Thomas Schneider said: > Hello Richard, > may I ask you that you also have a look at the NetRexx Languages, > which has now been OPEN SOURCED by IBM. > > From my experience, after yeras, it is much more easier to develop > Programs for the Java JVM in NetRexx, than in pure Java. But that is my > personal Opinion, and experience, of course. > > You'll find details about the current state of NetRexx at > www.netrexx.org, by the way. > > Maintenance is now done by the REXX Language association > (www.RexxLa.org). > > The user's group ibm-netrexx, which I copy here for info, > is used by NetRexx user's worldwide for Questions and Answer's. > > Kind regards from Vienna, > Thomas Schneider. > ================================================ > > > 22.09.2011 18:05, schrieb [hidden email]: >> Gentlemen: >> >> I am attempting to learn the Java language (after 30 years of C, C++, >> C#) so I downloaded an Embarcadero compiler named 'JBuilder'. It is >> an excellent compiler EXCEPT that it only allows a Java class to be no >> more than 64K in size. >> >> I have been completely spoiled by the Microsoft compilers that allow >> unlimited size on their 'classes'. Are there any Java compilers that >> allow Java classes to grow without bound? If so, what compilers are >> we talking about? >> >> Richard Braden, 303 736-8604 _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
|
|
In reply to this post by alansam
Hello Alan,
1.) I'm a NetRexx *fan*, since years (as you probably do know, from other posts) 2.) I'm using NetRexx exclusively for all my developments. 3.) Maybe, I'm *not* so aware of the rules for CROSS-Posting. The intent of my reply to the NetBean's development group [nbdef], on the question in question, has been to *spread the knowledge* about the existance of *NetRexx* What *is so bad* with this my attempt??? Thomas Schneider, CEO, ThSITC IT-Consulting KG Vienna, Austria *Full Stop*, *anyway* ======================================================== Am 22.09.2011 20:07, schrieb Alan Sampson:
--
Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
|
|
In reply to this post by Aviatrexx
Whil'st I still do *NOT* understand all those claim's about cross-posting,
probably because I'm not yet too acquainted with all those NetiQuettes, *I personally* simply wanted to make some advertisement for NetRexx. Sorry I did :-( Will now continue to prepare my slides for the NetRexx Presentation I'm helding at Linz, 27.09.2011, at the IBM ISV meeting (some 50-100 attendees) borrowing as much as I cann from all the available presentations. I'm getting more and more (personally) frustrated from some of those needless discussions, by the way :-) Thomas Schneider. ======================================================= Am 22.09.2011 23:33, schrieb Chip Davis: > Thomas, > > Did it cross your mind that your note contained zero information > content to members of ibm-netrexx? > > If you wanted us to see that you were being an advocate for NetRexx > among the NetBeans crowd, well, so what? Rest assured that we all are > advocates of NetRexx in other communities. We don't need or want to > see that you are spreading the word. You don't see us cross-posting > when we do it, do you? > > Furthermore, you referred to ibm-netrexx as a "user's group", not a > listserver, and gave him no information for joining us. If your > intention was that he would pick up on the fact that you "cc:" that > address, you not only cross-posted us for no good reason but made it > very unlikely that he figured out the association in the first place. > > Why didn't you give him "[hidden email]" in your message > and spare us yet-another-obnoxious-Thomas-Schneider-crosspost? > > -Chip- > > On 9/22/11 17:00 Thomas Schneider said: >> Hello Richard, >> may I ask you that you also have a look at the NetRexx Languages, >> which has now been OPEN SOURCED by IBM. >> >> From my experience, after yeras, it is much more easier to develop >> Programs for the Java JVM in NetRexx, than in pure Java. But that is >> my personal Opinion, and experience, of course. >> >> You'll find details about the current state of NetRexx at >> www.netrexx.org, by the way. >> >> Maintenance is now done by the REXX Language association >> (www.RexxLa.org). >> >> The user's group ibm-netrexx, which I copy here for info, >> is used by NetRexx user's worldwide for Questions and Answer's. >> >> Kind regards from Vienna, >> Thomas Schneider. >> ================================================ >> >> 22.09.2011 18:05, schrieb [hidden email]: >>> Gentlemen: >>> >>> I am attempting to learn the Java language (after 30 years of C, >>> C++, C#) so I downloaded an Embarcadero compiler named 'JBuilder'. >>> It is an excellent compiler EXCEPT that it only allows a Java class >>> to be no more than 64K in size. >>> >>> I have been completely spoiled by the Microsoft compilers that allow >>> unlimited size on their 'classes'. Are there any Java compilers >>> that allow Java classes to grow without bound? If so, what >>> compilers are we talking about? >>> >>> Richard Braden, 303 736-8604 > > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ > > -- Thomas Schneider (Founder of www.thsitc.com) Member of the Rexx Languge Asscociation (www.rexxla.org) Member of the NetRexx Developer's Team (www.netrexx.org) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
«
Return to ibm-netrexx
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |