Syntax highlighting

[christel.u.w.pachl christel.u.w.pachl]

Some time ago I succeeded in getting rosettacode,org to use
'my' (thanks to Jon Wolfers who started it) php files
for Rexx, ooRexx, and NetRexx. (GesHi is used for highlighting)
Except for violent refusal by one author there was never much feedback
let alone error reporting.
(I know of one error but it ain't easy to fix it in GesHi due to the "process")
Walter

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[alansam]

The highlighting for all three language variants look good to me and apart from the "detractor" you allude to I seem to remember that the consensus from the powers-that-be at Rosetta Code were that syntax highlighting is desirable as it is an aid to learning for those who are unfamiliar with a language: and that's the whole point of the site.

I for one appreciate your effort in that regard

alan.

On 7 September 2012 22:06, Walter Pachl <[hidden email]> wrote:

Some time ago I succeeded in getting rosettacode,org to use
'my' (thanks to Jon Wolfers who started it) php files
for Rexx, ooRexx, and NetRexx. (GesHi is used for highlighting)
Except for violent refusal by one author there was never much feedback
let alone error reporting.
(I know of one error but it ain't easy to fix it in GesHi due to the "process")
Walter

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

--
Can't tweet, won't tweet!

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Jason Martin]

As a side note, I contributed a NetRexx language syntax file to the maintainers of GtkSourceView this morning.
If they accept it, there will be more editors that support highlighting for NetRexx coders.

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[kenner]

I found the rexx.vim syntax file for vim but I can not find any netrexx.vim files. The one for REXX is a step up, but is there one specially for netrexx??

Kenneth Klein

Alan Sampson <[hidden email]>
Sent by: [hidden email]

09/08/2012 02:28 PM

Please respond to
IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>

To	IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
cc
Subject	Re: [Ibm-netrexx] Syntax highlighting

The highlighting for all three language variants look good to me and apart from the "detractor" you allude to I seem to remember that the consensus from the powers-that-be at Rosetta Code were that syntax highlighting is desirable as it is an aid to learning for those who are unfamiliar with a language: and that's the whole point of the site.

I for one appreciate your effort in that regard

alan.

On 7 September 2012 22:06, Walter Pachl <christel.u.w.pachl@...> wrote:
Some time ago I succeeded in getting rosettacode,org to use
'my' (thanks to Jon Wolfers who started it) php files
for Rexx, ooRexx, and NetRexx. (GesHi is used for highlighting)
Except for violent refusal by one author there was never much feedback
let alone error reporting.
(I know of one error but it ain't easy to fix it in GesHi due to the "process")
Walter

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/




--
Can't tweet, won't tweet!_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/