'nrc' on Unix-like systems

[Marc Simpson]

Hi all,

I'm new to NetRexx, so apologies if the following is a known issue:

On Unix-like systems (in my case, OS X), `nrc` (from version 3.01 RC2)
doesn't accept the `-run` option. The contents of the script are as
follows,

  java org.netrexx.process.NetRexxC $*

but '-run' is implemented in 'NetRexxC.sh',

  if test "$1"  = "-run"; then
    shift 1
    netrexx_run=yes
  fi

Two possible fixes come to mind: (i) replacing the contents of the
`nrc` script with a call to `NetRexxC.sh`,

  NetRexxC.sh $*

(which parallels the approach taken in 'nrc.bat'); (ii) creating a symlink:

  rm nrc
  ln -s NetRexxC.sh nrc

Should this be fixed?

All the best,
Marc

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Marc Remes-2]

That indeed seems wrong. My original nrc I still use shows

#!/bin/sh
#  BASH script alias for NetRexxC.sh script
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
#  Reminder: to make this executable: chmod 751 nrc
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
#  2000.08.20 -- initial version derived from nrc.bat

NetRexxC.sh $*

The same as the .bat and .cmd scripts do.

Marc

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[rvjansen]

Hi Marc,

it seems a very valid issue and I will look into fixing this.

best regards,

René.


On 2012-01-13 16:42, Marc Simpson wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to NetRexx, so apologies if the following is a known issue:
>
> On Unix-like systems (in my case, OS X), `nrc` (from version 3.01
> RC2)
> doesn't accept the `-run` option. The contents of the script are as
> follows,
>
>   java org.netrexx.process.NetRexxC $*
>
> but '-run' is implemented in 'NetRexxC.sh',
>
>   if test "$1"  = "-run"; then
>     shift 1
>     netrexx_run=yes
>   fi
>
> Two possible fixes come to mind: (i) replacing the contents of the
> `nrc` script with a call to `NetRexxC.sh`,
>
>   NetRexxC.sh $*
>
> (which parallels the approach taken in 'nrc.bat'); (ii) creating a
> symlink:
>
>   rm nrc
>   ln -s NetRexxC.sh nrc
>
> Should this be fixed?
>
> All the best,
> Marc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ibm-netrexx mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Marc Simpson]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, rvjansen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> it seems a very valid issue and I will look into fixing this.

Great—thanks!

Best,
M


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Tom Maynard]

On 1/13/2012 10:09 AM, Marc Remes wrote:

That indeed seems wrong. My original nrc I still use shows

Agreed.  My relatively new installation of v3.01RC2 has the following:

C:\NetRexx\bin>type nrc
java org.netrexx.process.NetRexxC $*



_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

[Kermit Kiser]

This was fixed in trunk October 1st. A new RC would include that and various other fixes.

-- Kermit


On 1/13/2012 8:42 AM, Tom Maynard wrote:

On 1/13/2012 10:09 AM, Marc Remes wrote:

That indeed seems wrong. My original nrc I still use shows

Agreed.  My relatively new installation of v3.01RC2 has the following:

C:\NetRexx\bin>type nrc
java org.netrexx.process.NetRexxC $*

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/