who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ?
many thanks in advance René Jansen _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
Will chek better at home latter. Right now Amazon works best from a BlackBerry at Spain (mind I think gateway is at UK).
------Original Message------ From: René Jansen Sender: [hidden email] To: IBM Netrexx ReplyTo: IBM Netrexx Subject: [Ibm-netrexx] netrexx site amazon ec2 test Sent: 11 Jun 2011 20:51 who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? many thanks in advance René Jansen _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ - Saludos / Kind regards, David Requena NOTE: The opinions expressed here represent the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of those who hold other opinions. _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
As far as I can tell, they are identical here on the east coast of the US.
BTW, I am honored to be quoted on the Examples page. I had forgotten that I pulled that little stunt. It certainly made the point, though. -Chip- On 6/11/11 18:51 René Jansen said: > who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? > > many thanks in advance _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
I'm happy to report acceptable performance from not-so-sunny Southern California. (Tested with Firefox, Safari and Chrome on Mac OS X). Fancy tab scrolling works on Safari and Chrome. Firefox; not so much.
A. On 11 June 2011 11:51, René Jansen <[hidden email]> wrote: who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? -- Can't tweet, won't tweet! _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Alan
-- Needs more cowbell. |
Hit send too early, posting should read: acceptable performance to Amazon site...
www.netrexx.org is not responding right now so I can't give a review. A
On 11 June 2011 13:10, Alan Sampson <[hidden email]> wrote: -- I'm happy to report acceptable performance from not-so-sunny Southern California. (Tested with Firefox, Safari and Chrome on Mac OS X). Fancy tab scrolling works on Safari and Chrome. Firefox; not so much. Can't tweet, won't tweet! _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Alan
-- Needs more cowbell. |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 15:51, René Jansen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? I only have a 1Mbit cable-modem (DOCSIS 2.0) broadband connection here. Both sites load awfully slow. I´m not sure what is downloading in the background, but something needs to be compressed, or loaded afterwards after the main text is displayed. A Splash screen (Welcome to Netrexx.org, loading..."), even if annoying for some, would help offset these delays while the rest of the page loads. See this: http://www.dynamicdrive.com/dynamicindex3/dhtmlsplash.htm While Amazon.com cloud is interesting, I wonder if you have tried other popular hosting destinations... For other projects I´ve had great results with a shared Linux hosting account at "Site Five", which is co-located in one of Colorado´s biggest datacenters. At less than $10/month, their shared hosting plans are a bargain. http://ho.io/Site5 Specially for what is provided in terms of point-and-click configuration ("Fantastico") of third party scripts (like Forums, PhpBB, etc). FC _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
both load in under 2 sec in BALTIMORE.
George On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:51 PM, René Jansen <[hidden email]> wrote: who can please check http://ec<a href="tel:2-67-202-36-54" value="+12672023654">2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
The Amazon version loads noticeably quicker at my location (west coast
US state of Washington) but after initial load is about the same. -- Kermit Kiser On 6/11/2011 11:51 AM, René Jansen wrote: > who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? > > many thanks in advance > > René Jansen > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ > > > Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by Fernando Cassia-2
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 17:21, Fernando Cassia <[hidden email]> wrote:
> http://ho.io/Site5 > > Specially for what is provided in terms of point-and-click > configuration ("Fantastico") of third party scripts (like Forums, > PhpBB, etc). The bad news is that Site5 doesn´t do Java servlets. If you instead prefer a Java based server, I´d suggest Kattare.com I have no relation with Kattare.com other than being a long time customer since 2001 to 2009. Plus, you´d be contracting a small business owner, or a family company if you prefer. Ethan Burnside is the company founder. http://www.servlets.com/isps/servlet/ISPReviewView?id=33 It is based in Oregon, USA. That´s as far as my hosting knowledge goes. Besides other options that burned me like crosswinds.net which you should avoid like the plague. That´s as far as my knowledge goes. If you prefer a UK based hosting, I can only vouch for GigaTux http://www.gigatux.com/ FC _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
Look identical here from USA east coast.
Jeff Hennick On 6/11/2011 2:51 PM, René Jansen wrote: > who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? > > many thanks in advance > > René Jansen > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ > > _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by George Hovey-2
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 17:23, George Hovey <[hidden email]> wrote:
> both load in under 2 sec in BALTIMORE. > > George Geographic location is only one factor. What is your contracted speed?. Ie go to www.speedtest.net FC _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by David Requena
Hello David, Rene, and all,
just did check here from Vienna, Austria, the Amazon URL Rene did provide... Much quicker than the original www.netrexx.org :-) Thomas. ======================================================= Am 11.06.2011 21:28, schrieb David Requena: > Will chek better at home latter. Right now Amazon works best from a BlackBerry at Spain (mind I think gateway is at UK). > > ------Original Message------ > From: René Jansen > Sender: [hidden email] > To: IBM Netrexx > ReplyTo: IBM Netrexx > Subject: [Ibm-netrexx] netrexx site amazon ec2 test > Sent: 11 Jun 2011 20:51 > > who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? > > many thanks in advance > > René Jansen > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ > > > > - > Saludos / Kind regards, > David Requena > > NOTE: The opinions expressed here represent the opinions > of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions > of those who hold other opinions. > > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ > > -- Thomas Schneider (www.thsitc.com) _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/
Thomas Schneider, Vienna, Austria (Europe) :-)
www.thsitc.com www.db-123.com |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
I get these numbers from Firebug in Firefox. They are each from a single run of each server, so I make no representation they are "average" or the like. (Actually, I did each twice and this is the better of the two. That 10-seconds is right.) The times reported are for the finishing of each download and include the time before trying to download do to thread limits. I have picked out the "max" of each as that would be when the last one have completed downloading. Location: East coast USA (western NY State). Time: late Saturday afternoon. The times do not include another 2-seconds or so to render the page.
[Editorial note: It looks like a lot of "extra" is being downloaded, compared to a "plain HTML"-file with 2 images (maybe one) that would look and behave the same way. While I'm sure that HYPE makes the maintenance of the whole site easier, consideration should be given to hand coding this first page to speed that "first load" that visitors see. And this page is likely to remain "static" for long periods of time. If you want, I could run one up in a hurry.] Jeff Hennick On 6/11/2011 2:51 PM, René Jansen wrote: who can please check http://ec2-67-202-36-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ from your part of the world and tell me how it compares with www.netrexx.org ? many thanks in advance René Jansen _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
Jeff,
thank you for this research. Based on it, and other reports, I have redirected www.netrexx.org to the cloud - specially now the first drop of the binary 3.00 release is downloadble. Maybe we should have a first page with <lowsrc> so it first loads a static version or some other trick. Although under a second seems quite acceptable. best regards, René Jansen. On Jun 12, 2011, at 12:44 AM, Jeff Hennick wrote:
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
IE seems to lock up....
BobH On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:06 PM, René Jansen <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by Jeff Hennick
I have taken a look at the website source. The "problem" is they
are downloading all 7 pages, with the images, before displaying the
first one! This speeds up changing from one internal page to
another, but at a large up front time cost. [I'm not convinced this
is a good trade off.]
So, it would not be possible to hand do just the first one. I have to withdraw my offer. Jeff Hennick On 6/11/2011 6:44 PM, Jeff Hennick wrote:
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by rvjansen
René -
Thanks for posting the 3.00 NetRexxC.jar binary. I have done some preliminary testing with NetRexxScript under jEdit using various test programs and so far the results look identical to 2.05 except for copyright and version notices of course. Congratulations! I will test with Android applications when a NetRexxR.jar is available. One question - the 3.00 jar file is much larger than the 2.05 jar file (454KB vs 348KB), largely due to the inclusion of a "diag" directory. The individual NetRexx classes are a bit larger also. It looks like maybe your build process has added some testing code. Can that be removed? -- Kermit On 6/11/2011 6:06 PM, René Jansen wrote: Jeff, _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by Aviatrexx
> As far as I can tell, they are identical here on the east > coast of the US. It says 'Loading' for quite a while, here (maybe on the other site, too). > BTW, I am honored to be quoted on the Examples page. I had > forgotten that I pulled that little stunt. It certainly made > the point, though. :-)) btw, the Examples page shows a date.nrx and .java -- but the "console log" is compiling hello.nrx? Mike _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by Fernando Cassia-2
speedtest.net says
ping 31 ms Download speed 13.87 Mbps Upload speed 2.26 Mbps (Firefox 5) On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Fernando Cassia <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
In reply to this post by Mike Cowlishaw
I'll try to trim down the 'loading' part a bit more. At this stage I think the scene transitions force the loading of all graphics in an early stage, and I'll try to do something about that.
hello.nrx - odd, isn't it? It was like that where I snagged it from. I'l correct it, to let the comment reflect the filename - although on itself, this will work. Thanks for observing this. René. On Jun 12, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > >> As far as I can tell, they are identical here on the east >> coast of the US. > > It says 'Loading' for quite a while, here (maybe on the other site, too). > >> BTW, I am honored to be quoted on the Examples page. I had >> forgotten that I pulled that little stunt. It certainly made >> the point, though. > > :-)) > > btw, the Examples page shows a date.nrx and .java -- but the "console log" is > compiling hello.nrx? > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Ibm-netrexx mailing list > [hidden email] > Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ > _______________________________________________ Ibm-netrexx mailing list [hidden email] Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |